Readathon: Ghost Cat, by Beverly Butler

ghostcatAnnabel is spending the summer with her great-aunt and -uncle and a bunch of cousins she’s never met. She would rather be at home with her mother, and feels very out of place on the lonely Wisconsin farm. But soon she hears the crying of a cat and sets off after it, and a mystery begins to unravel.

This was a childhood favorite of mine. I loved revisiting it for Readathon and RIP!! It’s the sort of book I read hundreds of times when I was a little girl. A couple years ago, I was reminiscing about it, and Jason went and found me a copy for Christmas! With the same cover I had as a kid and everything! I’ve now read it twice since that Christmas.

I have no idea if it’s really a “good” book. I’m too biased to be able to evaluate it that way. At least one of my sons has read it and liked it, though, so I guess the fact that it’s older (1984) doesn’t make it inaccessible now. It’s certainly dated in some respects, and you’d expect a children’s book to be, but even so, I still get a small thrill of terror as Annabel discovers the ghost cat and the circumstances of its death. I love watching her get to know a family she never knew (both the ones she’s staying with, and the ancestors she’s never known about). And I especially loved the cozy little Wisconsin setting. It reminds me of my brief home there in the early 2000s.

Note: Originally read in ~1988-ish.

Posted in 2010, Children's, Prose | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Readathon: A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen

dollshouseNora’s very happy. Her husband has just gotten a better job with a higher salary, and soon she’ll be free of a debt she incurred many years ago (without her husband’s knowledge) to finance a trip south that saved her husband’s life. But then the person who gave her the loan shows up. He’s being fired by Nora’s husband and tells her he will reveal everything if she doesn’t influence her husband to change his mind.

Okay, so I know that setup sounds a bit boring and lame, perhaps, but really, this play is worth reading and/or seeing. The whole time I was reading, I thought the play was pleasant and interesting, but not this really striking story that people always talk about. It was very easy to read, with very modern, flowing language despite a translation from the Norwegian and the fact that it was published in 1879. Altogether I thought it was fun and mildly interesting, but not amazing. When I got to the last few pages, however, it became that striking story. The next paragraph will be all spoilers, so if you want to walk away now, that’s okay – just know this play is really, really amazing and I highly recommend it. Also, for those of you out there interested in Women’s Studies, this is definitely one you want to check out!

Okay. The end. I was expecting Nora to be crushed or for everything to turn out well, probably the former. What I wasn’t expecting was Nora’s suddenly growing in her mind to understand that all she’s ever been to the men around her is a pet, a doll, a plaything. In one moment, because her husband is a real jerk to her instead of being considering, caring, or polite, she suddenly sees everything clearly. I love love LOVE what she says to him, and her decision to just leave. She must find herself and learn how to be a person, rather than a doll. Honestly I don’t even mind her walking away from children she never really did anything for anyway. It’s like she was thrown into a void, and realized she didn’t exist, and the only way to live again was to go find herself. What an amazing message. I was so surprised to find out this was written in 1879, and what a stir it caused then! It feels very modern, with a feminist message that wouldn’t have been out of place in the mid-to-late 20th century. It was so good!!

Posted in 2010, Adult, Drama | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Readathon: The Castle of Otranto, by Horace Walpole

the castle of otrantoManfred is desperate for his only son to wed and carry the family lineage down in the Castle of Otranto. There is a prophecy that says that the Castle will return to its rightful owner when that owner is “too big” to fit in Castle. The book opens on Manfred’s son’s wedding day, with a giant helmet falling from the sky and killing Manfred’s son. The rest of the book is filled with giant limbs, wayfaring priests, hidden catacombs, ghostly spectres, and tainted love.

Sounds fun, eh? The Castle of Otranto was one of the earliest Gothic novels (if not THE earliest), and I was really looking forward to it after loving The Monk. Sadly, it didn’t really live up to my expectations. It’s not that it was a bad book, but it was sort of difficult to read. Like 7-page paragraph sort of difficult. The conventions of dialog at the time weren’t the same as now, so there were no quote marks and no breaks between speakers, so that it was difficult at times to follow who was saying what. I imagine I would have enjoyed it more if I hadn’t been spending all my effort in unraveling the text itself. I wonder if a different edition might have been better…

But even without the textual issues, the story wasn’t very compelling to me. The characters were more in the old-fashioned archetype style rather than having individual characterizations, which has never worked well for me. Then there was the premise. All Gothic novels are meant to stretch the limits of your imagination, but this one stretched it just a bit too far for me. The whole “helmet falls from the sky” thing struck me as slightly absurd in a way that cross-dressing monks and the devil swooping a character across the sky didn’t. I’m well aware that not everyone would have this reaction, that cross-dressing monks and devil-swooping might seem just as (if not more) absurd than giant helmets falling from the sky, but for me, Otranto felt a little contrived. I appreciate what the book did – a genre has to get started somewhere, right? – but altogether it wasn’t my favorite Gothic novel.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Readathon: Amphigory Also, by Edward Gorey

Amphigorey-Also-9780156056724This is the third collection of Gorey’s graphic short stories that I’ve read, and I actually think it might be the best of the three. I split it up a couple stories at a time all day during the Readathon (because I get tired of reading stories after 2 or 3), and that was the perfect way to do it! This collection has seventeen stories. Of them, I loved all but two, and I particularly adored three: “The Utter Zoo,” “The Broken Spoke,” and “The Prune People.”

“The Utter Zoo” is about the 26 animals (one for each letter) in this zoo, and I loved the Yawfle. I giggled for five minutes after seeing his panel:

yawfle

“The Broken Spoke” is a collection of “bicycle cards” which range from elephant-and-bicycle cave drawings to religious tribute paintings to bicycles. The cemetery was my favorite.

“The Prune People” are collections of, um, people with prunes for heads. This one particularly struck me as ghost prune people are just as white as ghost regular people. 😀

Posted in 2010, Adult, Visual | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Thin Man, by Dashiell Hammett

thinmanThis is my third read by Hammett and probably my favorite. It’s a perfect detective story. I never suspected the actual criminal beforehand, despite having seen the movie a few years back (it’s also equally funny). (Shows how much I remembered that movie, no? Need to rewatch…) I learned a good bit about history while I read also, about prohibition and the Lindbergh baby, just by doing some additional spot-reading while I read. My favorite part about this book, however, is the dynamics between Nick and Nora. It’s rare in literature to see a long-time married couple who have have such a healthy relationship – not cute or romantic or anything, just healthy. They joke with each other, they aren’t jealous/suspicious, and they trust each other. Plus, they work well together, do things for each other, and have a wonderful give and pull sort of friendship and marriage. I thought the same when I saw the movie, and it makes me so happy to see marriage portrayed that way.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Gothic Charm School, by Jillian Venters

gothiccharmschoolGothic Charm School is a nonfiction book about goth culture and manners. Jillian Venters, aka “the Lady of the Manners,” takes us through a ton of different aspects of what it means (and doesn’t mean) to be a goth. For those of us, like me, who love goth culture, this is a hilarious and fun read. For those who are trying to understand goth culture, it’s a helpful tool to clearing up misconceptions and promoting understanding. I absolutely adored it.

The Lady of the Manners is extremely funny. The book is laced with sarcasm and gentle ribbing. She regularly refers to us gothy readers as “snarklings” and every time certain words or phrases are used (Babybat, Secret Goth Cabal, Real Goth, Sexy Death Chick, Undead Creatures of the Night), they are typed in gothy font to immediately put a different stress on them (be it cynical or loving). There are illustrations (by Pete Venters) all throughout the book to complement the text.

Best thing the Lady of the Manners tries to teach: to always be polite, whether you’re a goth yourself or you’re talking with someone who is. Being polite, no matter who you are or who you are with, is a good thing. That includes when you’re on the internet!! (something so many people forget, as I’ve been privy to so much lately) Another great thing: goth is not a “stage” you “grow out of,” it’s a set of interests and aesthetics that can be enjoyed by people of all ages and all backgrounds. Other great things the book emphasized: there’s no such thing as not being goth enough; there’s not a checklist of things to complete or a level of gothiness you must attain to be a “real goth;” there are many different types of goth culture; and my personal favorite: friends don’t let friends dress like The Crow. *snort* That one really cracks me up, especially because I had…um…an acquaintance once who adored dressing as The Crow all the time to try to show how goth he was. 😀

There’s only one point in this book where I really disagreed with Ms. Venters (well two, but one was very minor). There’s a huge debate in the goth world on whether goth is primarily about fashion or music, and Ms. Venters is on the fashion side of the debate. I’m on the music side. Technically, I would be on the literature side of the argument except that I only started reading gothic literature recently. I’ve been listening to goth music since I was sixteen, so I’ll have to stick with music on this one.

(The minor quibble, if anyone cares, is about Marilyn Manson. I have not listened to his music from the last decade, but I don’t consider his 90s stuff “metal.” It was very industrial, bordering on goth-industrial. Perhaps Ms. Venters is referring to his later stuff when she calls his music “metal,” but the classification still felt odd and wrong to me. See? It’s a very minor quibble. And not really even about goth stuff!)

There’s definitely a limited market for this book, but it’s perfect for anyone interested in goth culture (by immersion, proximity, or just plain curiosity). I’ve been holding onto my library’s copy for a couple weeks now and it’s almost due back, but this is one that I know one day I just have to own. I loved it to pieces!!

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Jamaica Inn, by Daphne du Maurier

Jamaica InnWhen Mary Yellan’s parents die, she must move up north to the moorlands to live with her Aunt Patience and Uncle Joss at Jamaica Inn. When she gets there, though, she finds that her aunt is no longer the happy person Mary knew growing up. Aunt Patience is cowering and sniveling, her husband towering over her as a drunken bully. But it isn’t just Uncle Joss’s violence that has beaten Aunt Patience down. There are secrets at Jamaica Inn, and Mary is determined to find them out.

Supposedly, Jamaica Inn is a retelling of Wuthering Heights, the same way Rebecca is meant to be a retelling of Jane Eyre. Considering I really disliked Wuthering Heights, I went into this book with trepidation, and I did see a lot of similarities, especially in landscape and in Joss’s character. The plot was very different, though, and involved an interesting set of characters, including a murderous peddler, a horse-thief, and an Albino pastor.

I’m in two minds about this book. On the one hand, I definitely liked Rebecca far more than Jamaica Inn. I felt it was better paced and had a better atmosphere, or perhaps, to be more accurate, I preferred the atmosphere of Rebecca to the wild moors of this book. I’ve never been fond of reading about the moors. They sound dull and tedious to me (probably because I’ve never been there). So the setting, so integral to this book, was very monotonous for me.

The characters were also extremely predictable. I could tell from the first third of the book exactly how it was going to end, who would end up being the bad guys and the good guys. Perhaps that’s just because I’m reading it decades after the fact, with modern sensibilities. I’ll grant the book that. And because of that, I tried not to let that predictability interfere with my reading.

I wavered back and forth, sometimes feeling bored, sometimes not wanting to put the book down. Despite my normal sensibilities, I really liked the horse thief character (Joss’s brother, Jem) and he had me laughing quite a few times. I wanted to see more of him than we were allowed to see. I also really liked Mary, who had far more spunk than anyone in Wuthering Heights (excepting Cathy, and she hardly counts because her spunk was more like CRAZY than ATTITUDE). Even Joss, in his violence and bullying, was a well-rounded, three-dimensional character, which is hard to pull off. du Maurier did very well at that.

But. But. In the end, I just couldn’t fully love this book. Something about the combination of the setting with the use of paganism and the really, really awful ending (spoiler: Really? Mary’s going to give up her strength and will and suddenly go gallivanting off with Jem??) made it so I can only really give this a middle of the road sort of review. There were periods, usually brief, where I wanted to keep reading, but for the most part, I had no trouble setting this book down for days at a time without picking it back up, even in the middle of a paragraph. It just wasn’t all that compelling.

I don’t want to sound like I completely disliked it. The end left a bad taste in my mouth, but there were good points. Over all, I remain mixed in feeling. I was hoping for another book like Rebecca, but unfortunately this one just didn’t live up to those hopes. Perhaps I’ll have better luck with my next du Maurier.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Queer Questions Straight Talk, by Abby Dees

Queer-Ques-Straight-TalkQueer Questions Straight Talk is subtitled “108 frank & provocative questions it’s OK to ask your lesbian, gay or bisexual loved one.” That pretty much sums up what this book is about. There is some introductory material and then the questions are split into sections, with a little discussion ahead of time, but mostly just questions to ponder. The book is meant to be used to open conversation between someone who falls into what Dees calls the “LesBiGay” category and their straight loved ones.

When this book was offered to me for review, I warned the publicist that I’m REALLY REALLY SLOW at reading nonfiction, and she assured me that this book was different. She was right. It’s a very small book, short and thin, and definitely easy to read. A good half of it deals with questions – questions that aren’t answered, but that are presented as conversation materials. The point is that Dees wasn’t answering these questions herself, but was trying to generate talk between parties. Each of us possibly asked these questions would have a different response. I flew through the book. When I finally sat down to read it, it took me less than an hour to finish.

Dees explores tons of different avenues and has talked to many people. I was particularly impressed with something she said in the introduction, something that I’ve struggled with myself (though I’m not going into details here, sorry). To me, that little detail is what really hooked me, the time and effort she put into her research and studies. She was very thorough, and I appreciated that.

Unfortunately, this is the sort of book that it’s difficult to get much out of on its own. It’s simply not the sort of book that’s meant to work by itself. It’s meant to be a tool to help get people talking. At the end, what I was left with was a wish that I had someone that I could talk to. As a bisexual woman who has been living in a monogamous relationship with her husband for the last 11 years, I’ve honestly had no reason to talk to anyone about my sexuality if I don’t want to. My family can be quite judgmental in this area, so other than my cousins (who thankfully didn’t inherit those judgmental views), siblings (same), and my dad (who’s better than most), I’ve never bothered to tell anyone. I don’t see the point. It would just be uncomfortable for all of us and I really don’t want to deal with it. I have that right, of course, but it’s funny because for those people I don’t mind telling (cousins, siblings, my dad, friends, all you lovely bloggers), I’m not sure this book would help us. It might be useful if I ever tell my mom, or someone else who I know simply wouldn’t understand.

I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen. I’m not sure if the people who I haven’t told and could tell would be willing to read this book and have a conversation either. You have to be the right sort of person to read this book and be willing to ask questions. That limits its market. But! Having a limited market does not make the book pointless, not by any means. Instead, it caters to what will hopefully be a growing body of people trying to understand something they might have previously had misconceptions about. It’s good that books like this are out there and available. I hope one day I get to hand my copy to a friend or family member and open discussions. And if I know anyone else having this same conversation, I will definitely recommend this book.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Murder on the Orient Express, by Agatha Christie

murder-on-the-orient-express-agatha-christieMy second Christie was just as fun as my first and it balanced out in terms of which book was better. This had less info-dump at the end than And Then There Were None, but it also relied more heavily on cultural stereotypes (a pet peeve of mine), so it had both better and worse points. I wasn’t particularly fond of Poirot himself, but I enjoyed many of the other characters. Over all, I liked the book, and I actually partially figured out the solution in advance!

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Monk, by Matthew Gregory Lewis

the-monkI hardly know what to say about this book, it was such a trip. It was like a 1700s gothic Harlequin romance adventure thriller allegory! Every gothic element you can think of was in the book, excepting the whole vampire/zombie/werewolf stuff which didn’t get popular until later in literary history. But seriously, everything else: evil clergymen, gypsies, fortune tellers, ghosts, demons, sorcerers, cross-dressing monks, bands of robbers, murderers, The Wandering Jew, and the Devil himself; as well as rape, murder, incest, hallucinations, visions of the world beyond, torture chambers, and more. Seriously, take every single gothic element you can think of and throw them into the mix that is The Monk. And yet, it all comes together! It doesn’t feel like a disjointed narrative at all.

There are a couple different plotlines that flow through The Monk. The first is the story of Antonia and her mother Elvira. Elvira married above her, and her husband’s father rejected her, so after her husband died, she and Antonia were left with nothing. As you can imagine, Antonia is incredibly beautiful and innocent.

Then there’s Lorenzo and his sister Agnes, who disobeyed her family by having a brief affair with another nobleman (whose story probably consists of about a third of the book, and who had so many different names that I actually can’t remember any of them, whoops!), and who is now in the hands of unforgiving nuns. Lorenzo is in love with Antonia, and at the same time, trying to save his sister.

Lastly, and most importantly, there’s the Monk himself: Ambrosio, known for his piety and severity, is of course going to have to fall from grace. The Monk is subtitled “a romance,” and while there are quite a few romances going on in this book, I would hazard a guess that the primary romance is between Ambrosio and The Devil, as Ambrosio comes to slowly embrace all the carnal desires he has repressed from birth to his current 30 years. This isn’t a spoiler – it’s pretty obvious from the very beginning that pious, angelic Ambrosio won’t stay that way forever. It’s written all over his dark eyes and curved nose and powerful, dangerous voice! (PS – Yes, I know that’s not what the “a romance” is actually talking about. I’m being facetious here. Go with it.)

This book is melodrama from page one, the very epitome of 1700s gothic sensationalism. I can see exactly why this would have been scandalous, and at the same time, gobbled up by readers. In a time where most of the literature I’ve read has been dull and prim and proper, it was nice to read what the masses read and not just the religious upper class! And unlike The Mysteries of Udolpho, which I tried to read earlier this year, there wasn’t a glut of description or any lull in action the entire book. It was go-go-go the whole time.

I loved it! I laughed a lot (even when it wasn’t technically supposed to be funny) and there were times when I absolutely could not put the book down. My only complaint was that sometimes the story within a story within a story format got tiresome, and the names of the Spanish noblemen were very confusing, mostly because they each had like twenty different names (hence me not even remembering one of the main character’s names). It was like trying to read a Russian novel. But otherwise, I enjoyed every bit of the melodrama, symbolism, allegory, and pure hysteria that was in The Monk. Plus, I just found out they’re making a movie of this one!! I can’t wait!

Before I end this, I must give a shout-out to Erika for recommending this book to me. I think this was the first review of yours I ever read, back in RIP season last year, and I knew immediately I had to read it for RIP this time! This book was so much fun. I loved it!! So thank you! I’d never even heard of this book before your review!

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments