Books:
Archive:
Favorite Reviews:
I have reviewed many books over the years, and some reviews have been more interesting or fun to write than others. The below list were my favorites to write.
• Ada, or Ardor
• Choose Your Own Autobiography
• Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
• If Not, Winter
• Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell
• The Kid Table
• Like Water for Chocolate
• Lolita
• The Monk
• The Night Circus
• Oathbringer
• Return of the Native
• Rhythm of War
• S
• Things Fall Apart
• The Unit
• The Woods Are Always WatchingCategories:
Tags:
- abandoned
- Africa
- Asia
- atmospheric
- audio
- BBAW
- body image
- callback
- circus horror
- classics
- collection
- comfort
- Cosmere
- cruise
- divinity
- dream-invader
- education
- end of year
- fanfiction
- favorite
- fitness
- food
- gender studies
- goals
- good omens
- Harry Potter
- health
- historical
- house
- humor
- I made a thing.
- joint review
- KonMari
- Latin America
- LGBTQIA
- lists
- memorable
- Middle East
- mini-review
- multi-read
- nonfiction
- photography
- place-character
- POC
- portentous
- psychology
- quarantine
- race report
- readathon
- reread
- revisiting
- RIP-worthy
- running
- shredded me
- speculative
- Sunday Coffee
- tarot
- tattoo
- the ferals
- translation
- travel
- Wellness Wednesday
- WTF moments
- Yarn Art


-


Sorcerers and Secretaries, by Amy Kim Ganter
This was my very first Manga. My son bought it at the library sale last weekend, but it’s rated for 13+ so I decided to read it before letting him have it. And for the record, it certainly is too old for him. He’ll have to wait until the recommended age, I think.
I wasn’t terribly impressed with this book. It was a little too young for my tastes, and I don’t really like Manga art. Not that I’ve yet seen anyway. The story was trite, just a girl who daydreams a lot of fantasy and who is in love with a player but won’t tell him because…well, because he’s a player. This is volume 1 of a series, and I’m not really interested in reading the next edition. I’m sure this would appeal to a younger age, but it didn’t for me. That’s probably just because I’m completely and utterly unfamiliar with Manga. There wasn’t really anything wrong with the book; it just wasn’t my taste.
Posted in 2009, Visual, Young Adult
Leave a comment
Memoirs of a Teenage Amnesiac, by Gabrielle Zevin
When Naomi wakes up from her bad fall down the stairs of her high school, she can’t remember the last four years of her life. She doesn’t know about her parents’ divorce, her father’s recent engagement, her mother’s remarriage, or her 3-year old sister. She doesn’t know her best friend, the quirky, honest Will. She doesn’t know her boyfriend, the popular, athletic Ace. She doesn’t know why she shouldn’t get involved with the moody new student, James. Worst of all, she doesn’t know herself. Was she really the sort of girl who kept a detailed food diary and spent 20+ hours a week working on the yearbook? Did she really hide Cliffs Notes versions of books in her closet and think tennis wristbands were a romantic gift? And if she doesn’t know who she is, if she can’t remember, how can she possibly go on being the person everyone expects her to be?
This was a pretty good book. It didn’t sweep me away completely, mostly because I really didn’t like Naomi and she was narrating. She was realistically drawn, most of the main characters were, but she was the irritatingly self-centered sort of girl that I’ve always avoided. Will, on the other hand, was brilliant. I loved everything about him, from his old fashioned turns of phrase to his vintage velvet coats. I also liked James, though his unnamed emotional disorder was so perfectly presented that he seriously disturbed me and I didn’t want him anywhere near Naomi. The books’ end was a little farfetched but admittedly exactly what I’d hoped for, given the circumstances.
The idea of amnesia scares me. I mean, seriously terrifies me. When I was a teenager, I used to have dreams that I had woken up from a 4-year coma to find myself completely different (I blame some book I can no longer remember for instilling that fear in me – Update! I found it. The Other Side of Dark by Joan Lowery Nixon). I used to dream that my friends would leave me behind, or that I’d go into the coma when I was married and that my husband would leave me, my kids would forget. Serious fear. Amnesia is not much better than living in a coma – you’ve still lost that time. Maybe even worse – you’ve lost the time but no one else has. People have memories of you that you don’t have. That’s horrible horrible horrible. I don’t know what I’d do if I ever got amnesia. I know the first thing I’d be looking for is a diary I’d written. Makes me think I should do a better job keeping up with a diary…
But beyond that, what if you lost years of your life, and then at some time months or years after your accident, you suddenly remembered everything again? I’m not saying Naomi remembered – I actually won’t say either way – but I’m just trying to imagine what it would be like if you (the metaphorical ‘you’) were in her situation and then did remember after a long period of time. I mean, you couldn’t remember your past, you created a new life with a new personality, new friends, new interests, and suddenly you could remember why you had that old personality, those old friends, and those old interests. How could you cope? It’d be like losing your life all over again, or suddenly having two lives. All these knotty questions are stuffed into this book, and they make me quite uncomfortable, given how terrified I am of the subject matter. Zevin does a good job addressing all the difficulties and fears associated with amnesia. I’m looking forward to reading more by her.
Lost in a Good Book, by Jasper Fforde
I don’t usually use the book-jacket description, but in this case, I couldn’t explain the essence of this followup to The Eyre Affair better:
If Thursday thought she could avoid the spotlight after her heroic escapades in the pages of Jane Eyre, she was sorely mistaken. The unforgettable literary detective…has another think [sic] coming.
The love of her life has been eradicated by the corrupt multinational Goliath, and to rescue him Thursday must retrieve a supposedly vanquished enemy from the pages of “The Raven.” But Poe is off-limits to even the most seasoned literary interloper. Enter a professional: the man-hating Miss Havisham from Dickens’s Great Expectations. As Miss H’s new apprentice, Thursday keeps her motives secret as she learns the ropes of Jurisfiction, where she moonlights as a Prose Resource Operative inside books. As if jumping into the works of Kafka and Austen, and even Beatrix Potter’s Tale of the Flopsy Bunnies, weren’t enough, Thursday finds herself the target of a series of potentially lethal coincidences, the authenticator of a newly discovered play by the Bard himself and the only one who can prevent an unidentifiable pink sludge from engulfing all life on Earth.
Whew. See why I couldn’t sum that up any better? Ironically, this even leaves out a couple of the plotlines, including a major one about Neanderthals – which was one of my favorites.
I liked this book better than The Eyre Affair. Maybe it was because I knew exactly what to expect this time, and I didn’t worry about the book’s structure or the insane number of various intertwined plots. I relaxed and just took it at face value, not bothering to figure out how something like a “footnoterphone” would work/look like in real life. It’s a book. And a funny one at that.
My favorite scene was Thursday’s trial, which followed Joseph K’s trial from Kafka’s The Trial. (How’s that for using the word “trial” three times in one sentence??) Jasper Fforde has amazing talent, being able to replicate the tone and feel in classic literature with a precision that’s scary. From Kafka’s surrealist absurdity to Poe-esque poetry filled with Jack Schitt’s obscenities, he gets it right every time. I’ve never even read Great Expectations, and yet I don’t doubt that when I do, I will recognize Miss Havisham’s speech and mannerisms.
And in all this, Fforde still manages to create something that isn’t just a 400-page literary play on words. There are actually moments of sadness in this book, as well as a fairly strong stance on evolution, unethical science, and corporate profit. One of my favorite lines was: “Growth purely for its own sake is the philosophy of cancer.”
I can’t describe how good this series is. It’s hysterical. It’s fun. It’s a literary explosion. I can’t wait to read the next book, and recommend this series to everyone.
Posted in 2009, Adult, Prose
Tagged favorite, historical, humor, revisiting, speculative
Leave a comment
13 Reasons Why, by Jay Asher
Clay Jensen comes home to find a package waiting for him with seven cassette tapes inside. Immediately, he starts playing the first, and regrets it. The tapes are from Hannah Baker, Clay’s longtime crush, a girl who killed herself two weeks previously. And according to Hannah, these tapes are addressed to the thirteen people she blames for ruining her life, the thirteen reasons why she committed suicide.
I could not put this book down. This is not a book to pick up at 2 in the afternoon on Tuesday. I made that mistake. I read while eating, read while watching the news, read during commercial breaks of the only tv show I watch (NCIS)… Finally, around 10:15, I told my husband there was no way I would be able to go to bed without finishing. I gave myself up, no matter how much my eyes hurt, no matter how tired I got. This would make an excellent late night Read-a-thon book! It’s amazing all around.
Now I know, just a few posts ago, I was complaining about books that make me turn the pages so fast I get tired. Books that dragged me along and didn’t let me stop. I can’t apply the same rules here. The Knife of Never Letting Go was plot-based. I was running along an adventure. Thirteen Reasons Why is a psychological drama, with very little actual plot. Tons of downtime, even if I was still turning pages. It’s a narrative, a listening to thirteen sides of cassette tape, and hearing Clay’s thoughts and memories as he follows along with Hannah’s. Though you meet few of the characters, you get to know them through Hannah’s perspective.
Suicide. Can you blame someone else for a death that you chose? Or is that just a cop-out? Are the thirteen victims of Hannah’s revenge honestly responsible for her death? Perhaps not. Sure, they might have caused misery in one form or another, some worse than others. But a lot of the things they did were just stupid kid stuff, stuff I remember happening to kids in middle school. Stuff most people get over, even if they have a few scars afterwards. Sure, there were some that were really nasty (like the Peeping Tom or the guy stealing the “encouragement notes”). But some things Hannah talks about were so trivial on the surface that no one knew how badly they affected her. I don’t know that Asher gives a clear answer to who ought to take the blame. Hannah? Her tormentors and teasers? The one person who doesn’t torment her but also doesn’t know how to help? Hannah knew what she was doing. She very clearly planned out her death and the ramifications with these tapes. However, she may never have gotten to that level of depression if it weren’t for the things that happened to her. It all becomes so muddled, it’s hard to say which side of the story is right.
I feel sorry for many of these characters. I feel sorry for Clay, for Hannah, for several of the people on the tape who were simply stupid, callous teenagers. I don’t feel sorry for several others, people who deliberately used Hannah in one way or another in order to gratify their own feelings. But no matter who has what share in the story, one thing is clear: all actions, large or small, affect others. You never know who may be teetering on the edge of a precipice, begging to be pulled back, only needing the tiniest push to fall.
I want to relate a small personal story, names omitted. Normally I don’t get so personal in my book reviews, but this book hit very close to home, and this is why. I knew a girl in high school, and really cared about her. For years, she was suicidal, and she would call me every time she decided to die. To say goodbye. And I had to find the magic words to fix things. I did everything I knew, and was terrified that one day she wouldn’t call. Then, one day at school, another friend said something to me I’ll never forget: “Why do you bother worrying about her? You know one day she’ll just kill herself anyway.” I hated him for saying that. I hated him for his attitude and nonchalance. I swore I would continue to help my friend as long as she needed me.
Thirteen years later, my friend is alive and much healthier. She hasn’t called me to say goodbye in at least a decade. I love her and am glad that I never gave up on her, that when I was her last resort, I didn’t take the easy road out. People have said it wasn’t fair of her to do all that to me, but I don’t care. I didn’t care. I never once considered abandoning her. If I had, she very well might not be alive right now. I’m glad I was able to be her lifeline, the arm that pulled her off the precipice every time she got too close to falling. Our actions really can make a difference.
The Witches of Worm, by Zilpha Keatley Snyder
Jessica is a lonely girl of about thirteen years old. She has few friends, and her mother leaves her home alone most nights. One day Jessica finds a very ugly baby kitten and takes him home despite not really liking cats. She and her mother name him Worm, because in his scrawny, almost-hairless, newborn state, that’s exactly what he looks like.
But Worm isn’t a normal cat. He doesn’t play or cry like other cats, and his stare feels hypnotic to Jessica. And one day, she hears him speak. He tells her to do terrible things to the people around her, and she can’t control her actions. Jessica has read all about witches, and knows Worm must be a witch’s cat, but she has no idea how to escape the spell he’s put on her. As she looks for a solution, she has to come to face the truth about herself.
Zilpha Keatley Snyder is one of my favorite children’s authors. I believe this is the fourth book I’ve read by her. She always manages to create a spooky story that borders on the supernatural, without ever really crossing the line. In this book, she’s created a parallel for the Salem Witch trials and Ann Putnam. She explores the psychology of a child always left alone, and the greed of power and attention. The Witches of Worm is one of those books that shows up frequently on banned books lists, and once again, I don’t see why. It teaches a good lesson, and there’s nothing immoral about it. I think this is a great book for kids to read. Maybe those trying to ban it don’t read it all the way through…they hear “witches” and cry foul.
One of the things I’ve noticed about Snyder’s books is that she spends a lot of time talking about children of single parents – single either by divorce, death, abandonment, or having never married in the first place. Some of these single parents are good, and try as hard as they can, and some are neglectful, like Jessica’s mother. Either way, the children in these families often feel different and alone. Snyder wrote a lot in the 60s and 70s, when nontraditional families were different and strange, but were also becoming more common. I think she captures the children’s worries about not fitting in perfectly. While the same rules might not apply today – no one really looks at kids funny for only having one parent anymore – I think the feelings Snyder brings up are still valid. Kids are looked at funny for other reasons. There is always discrimination, teasing, and bullying in school. There are always kids that struggle with fitting in.
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
This book is exactly what the title suggests: a look at one day in Ivan Denisovich (Shukhov)’s life. Shukhov was arrested on baseless charges – fairly common at that time – and was sentenced to ten years in a Siberian labor camp. The book explores one day in his eighth year, a winter’s day that is a – relatively – good day. It is as much about the labor camp as it is about Shukhov and the other prisoners.
This was an excellent book. I’ve stated in the past that I know very little about Russian history, philosophy, geography, and politics, but that didn’t matter for this book. When you’re standing outside in below-zero temperatures, pre-dawn, with clothes not quite thick enough to keep you warm, what do politics matter? When you have to fight to get your bowl of watery gruel and a chunk of bread a couple times a day, when you have to walk two miles to your day’s labor site in harsh Siberian wind, philosophy doesn’t matter so much. What matters is survival. And not just physical survival, but mental and emotional survival, too. Solzhenitsyn makes it clear multiple times in this book that if you solely looked out for your physical survival, like the scrounger, Fetyukov, you probably wouldn’t live out your years in the camp. Instead, you must learn camp culture. You form alliances with your labor gang; you figure out the most profitable way to get more than you would get alone. You respect your gang boss if he’s a good one, because he’s the one that’ll get you good jobs and good “wages.” You work hard because otherwise you’d freeze to death, plus your rations would be smaller. You keep in line because otherwise your whole gang is punished, and a hoard of angry, freezing men is not an enemy you want.
The Siberian labor camps were horrible, and it would be easy to imagine the prisoners as hateful or miserable or hopeless. And yet, they aren’t any of those things. Sure, they don’t like the life they’ve been forced into. They don’t like the cold or the short food rations or the nearly pointless labor. They don’t like the long hours, the lack of cigarettes, or the inability to go to the hospital when they’re sick. But they don’t dwell on those things. They can’t. Some of them are sentenced to 25 years. If they got caught up in anger or despair, they wouldn’t survive. Instead, the men adapt. They figure out the best way to do things. They learn to treat each day as it comes, to acknowledge good days and bad days, to know that every day that you aren’t dead is essentially a good day. They find little happinesses in unexpected places. A bite of sausage a bunkmate received from home and shared with you, or a spot near the fire for your socks to stay overnight so they’d be warm in the morning. Strange to say, but despite all the horrors happening in the labor camp, this book actually filled me with hope and faith in humanity.
Solzhenitsyn himself served time in the Siberian labor camps. After he was freed, he wrote this book and The Gulag Archipelago, both about the camps. I’ve not read the latter, but I can wholeheartedly recommend this book. It took me over a week to read it, but only because it was the sort of book that felt better read slowly, absorbing and digesting each piece. Even through translation, the writing was superb, and Solzhenitsyn managed to attack the Soviet government and its policies without the book sounding or feeling solely angry or cynical. I really enjoyed it.
Liza of Lambeth, by William Somerset Maugham
Liza of Lambeth takes a look at life in Lambeth – a poor, working class section of London. Liza is an 18-year-old beauty who attracts a lot of suitors, but she doesn’t get smitten herself until Jim Blakestone moves onto her street. Jim is a 40-year-old married man with several children – including a daughter only a couple years younger than Liza – who is aggressive and somewhat abusive to his wife. The two start an affair, which eventually leads to Liza’s downfall.
I love William Somerset Maugham. I’ve read all his famous books and several of his lesser-known works. Few have disappointed me. Liza of Lambeth is Maugham’s first published novel, published when he was 23 and working as a doctor in Lambeth. He tried to capture what he saw of the population there, including the dialect (which is spelled out phonetically throughout the book). However, I’m not sure he really understood the people of that district. Compared to his other books, the characterizations felt very shallow and sensational. The plot seemed a little flimsy in places, and it wrapped up too quickly and a little unbelievable. It definitely seemed like a first attempt at a novel, and wasn’t his most successful book. By the time he wrote Mrs. Craddock a few years later, he’d much improved.
On the good side, it was extremely easy to read – I finished it in about four hours. It was a light break from the heavier books I’ve been reading, and it was an interesting depiction of a population I know nothing about. When I say his characterization was shallow, I only mean on an individual level. He seemed to understand the community and their daily, public interactions, but not the motivations or private lives of individual people. So it did feel like an accurate portrayal of a community, even if the characters themselves were a little two-dimensional.
This isn’t my favorite Maugham book, by far, but it’s not bad, either. I wouldn’t recommend starting with it. I’d say this is really for the die-hard Maugham fans. For first-time readers, I’d recommend Mrs. Craddock or The Painted Veil. Pretty much anything but The Magician, which is the only Maugham book that I absolutely hated.
The Diary of Anne Frank, by Anne Frank
Anne Frank began this diary on her 13th birthday, June 14, 1942. A couple months later, her family went into hiding in Amsterdam with two other families. For two years, they lived in tense conditions. The diary closes on August 1, 1944, a couple days before their hiding place was raided and they were all arrested and sent to camps. Only Anne’s father survived.
Technically, this is a reread for me, but it’s been so long it’s like a first reading. I was about 13 when I first read Anne Frank’s diary. At the time, I thought I really could relate to Anne, but looking back, I know I wasn’t nearly as insightful or intelligent as this little girl was. My diaries from that time of my life were far inferior in content, style, and perception. I’m sure part of that was my lack of exposure to the sorts of horrors Anne had to live through, but still, I was blown away reading this by how wise she was. Far beyond her years. Her strength and resiliency astounds me.
At the same time, while I was reading, I couldn’t help feeling like I was intruding on Anne’s privacy. Mostly, this is because of a discussion I had with my sister when she read the Diary in school a couple years after me. She told me how upsetting the experience was for her, not because of the content, but because she felt it was wrong to publish someone’s diary without their permission, no matter the contribution it might make. She maintains this stance to this day, and has expanded it to include letters and other private documents.
Many people don’t want their private papers published after their deaths, and yet the public continues to be hungry for these things. People want to read Jane Austen’s letters and are sad most were burned by Cassandra. We mourn the loss of much of Sylvia Plath’s journals. Kafka might be a little peeved that the people he asked to burn his diaries published them instead. Emily Dickinson wanted all her stuff gone, and yet we have letters and poems and all sorts of things. And people want more. All of these posthumously published papers give us great insights. So the question is, where do we draw the line? If a person does not want their journals and letters published, ought we to do it against their will after their death because of how important said journals and letters might be? Or ought we to respect their wishes and destroy them?
And what if, like Anne, they never had a chance to say what they wanted, one way or another? How can we weigh the importance of her story against exposing all her private thoughts? Was it right to publish her diary?
I don’t have the answer to that. I can see the argument for both sides. I’m very grateful we have this story, but I hope that Anne wouldn’t be mortified that we do. I do admit that near the end (April 4, 1944), she wrote a passage that made me feel much better about reading the diary. Sort of an implied permission:
I want to go on living even after my death! And therefore I am grateful to God for giving me this gift, this possibility of developing myself and of writing, of expressing all that is in me.
Perhaps she hadn’t intended to live on after her death by this diary, but certainly she has lived on. With her life as miserable as it became, and cut so short, at least there is this one compensation: she will never be forgotten.
Note: Review date is only an approximate of when this book was read/reviewed in 2009.
Note: Originally read ~1994-ish.
We Are On Our Own, by Miriam Katin
Random note: This was my first review on The Zen Leaf (original) instead of 5-Squared.
And God said: Let there be light, and there was light…and it was good.
And then one day, God replaced the light with darkness.
We Are On Our Own is a graphic novel memoir about Katin’s childhood (though she names herself Lisa in the book). It is about both her physical and spiritual struggles. When Lisa was very young, she and her mother had to leave Budapest in disguise to escape the Nazis. The book follows them on their journey into Russia, where they come across both good people and bad people, and are constantly trying to escape one harm or another. Though the reader sees what is happening – rape, death, abortion, starvation, etc – the narrative is from the perspective of the child, with all the ignorance and innocence of childhood. But even with all the ignorance and innocence of childhood, Lisa is not protected from pain and loss, and she begins to question her faith in God. Interspersed throughout the story are scenes from Lisa’s adulthood, particularly dealing with identity according to ethnic and religious heritage (like her father, she becomes an atheist Jew).
For the last week, I’ve been slowly reading The Diary of Anne Frank, and this book made a great companion novel. The artwork was stunning, and the story was beautiful. The themes were laid out so lightly that it didn’t feel preachy or pushy. The light tone didn’t lessen the impact of the book, though. I will likely reread it before giving it back the library.