Puppet Master, by Joanne Owen

puppetmasterI hardly know how to describe this book. It takes place in late 1890s Prague. Milena is a little girl who lost both her parents three years earlier. Her father died; her mother disappeared. Milena now lives with her grandmother and has two aunts nearby. Milena longs for the days past when her father was running a marionette theatre, and desperately wants to go to the new marionette show that has come to town, despite it being run by a creepy puppet master and his two evil twin assistants. The book is steeped in Czech folklore, both true and deviated from legend, and could best be defined by the term “circus horror.” In tone, it has a feel similar to Coraline or Enchanted Night.

This was a very intriguing book. I got the new paperback version that just came out, and I love the way it’s set up. The pages are all swept up in dusty color along the edges and corners to make it feel sooty or old (like the sooty edges of the cover in the picture above). There are illustrations and photos all throughout. The chapters are split into five sections, called Acts to make it more theatre-like, and the characters are all given an introduction prior to the book starting as The Players (again, like a play). The creep-factor runs the gamut from marionettes that seem almost lifelike to poisoned absinthe to mirror mazes. This would be a perfect book for RIP, as well as a wonderful folklore edition to my Once Upon a Time Challenge. I had no idea it was folklore-based when I began!

I loved this book, but admit that it has some issues. Honestly I’m not sure how big of a printing Puppet Master got, but it feels as if the publisher didn’t pay as much attention to the book as they should have. My problems aren’t with the story itself, but the editing and printing. For example, there were copy-editing mistakes all over the text, just like an ARC would have. Periods missing. Quotes in the wrong places. Paragraphs that end with a comma instead of a full stop. And then there were some basic fact mistakes that ought to have been caught by any editor or copy-editor, like Milena’s grandmother calling her daughter-in-law’s sisters her own sisters-in-law, or the assertion that the two twins, a boy and a girl, were identical twins.

The story itself was wonderful, and the writing exquisite. There were some places in the high action where I got a little confused by who was where – again, something an editor should have been able to help improve. I feel like this was a wonderful little book that got shafted by the publisher, honestly. It could have been magnificent, and instead, it’s just great. Not that great is bad, great is certainly good. It’s a definite keeper book and I’d love for my kids to read it too! But I get frustrated that people will look at these little errors and think they’re the author’s fault, when really, 95% of them aren’t.

I hope this review doesn’t make it sounds like I didn’t enjoy the book. Because I did. I picked it up and read it all in a single day. I didn’t want to put it down. It’s gripping and slightly creepy and I think I’m going to read it again near Halloween! I love the way everything comes together and how all the folklore is woven in piece by piece. I love that Owen gives information at the end about the real folklore and provides a glossary and some information about Czech language and history. And for someone who has wanted to go to Prague forever, I’m aching to go even more now!

Posted in 2010, Children's, Prose | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Will Grayson, Will Grayson, by John Green and David Levithan

200px-WillGraysonWill Grayson #1 (WG1) is a temperamental teenager from Chicago who tries to live life without caring about anything in order not to get hurt. His best friend – more of a friend by proximity than anything else – is Tiny Cooper: a very large, very gay football player who wants to put on a musical about love and acceptance.

Will Grayson #2 (WG2) is a moody, depressed, cynical teenager from the suburbs of Chicago. He’s poor, he’s on mood meds, and he doesn’t really like any of the “friends” he sits with at school. At night he has an online romance with a boy named Isaac that he’s never met.

Will Grayson, Will Grayson follows the lives of these two Will Graysons, first separately, then more intertwined after the two meet.

I am so, so happy Darren alerted me to the existence of this book, which I had no idea was coming out until maybe a month ago (bad me!). I am also so, so happy that my friend Brittany got me a signed copy of said book at the John-Green-David-Levithan tour event in Austin, even if I was so, so sad that I couldn’t go myself. The book was every bit as wonderful as I expected and as everyone has said. I loved it.

I could just keep squeeing, but I figure I ought to say something about WHY I love the book, beyond the fact that it’s John Green (whose videos crack me up) and David Levithan (whose books I’ve loved for a long time now).

First, unsurprisingly, WGWG was extremely well-written. I have no idea which author wrote which sections, but both were expertly done. What else would anyone expect?

Second, I loved the characters. I wasn’t sure at first about WG2 because he was all moody and rude, but by the end of his first section, I loved him. He actually reminds me a lot of the way I was as a teen. I just had to remember that mentality and open up to him.

Third, this book had me cracking up laughing every couple pages. It had my teary on other pages. A rollercoaster like that is difficult to pull off, but JG and DL did fantastic!

Fourth, Tiny Cooper. Best. Character. EVAH. Just saying. Normally I don’t like people who act like stereotypes, especially GLBT stereotypes because it’s, as one character says multiple times, “bad for the team.” But Tiny – he’s MORE than a stereotype. He’s himself, and I absolutely fell in love with him. Not sure I’d want to be his best friend, but I’d love to give him a big hug.

I did have a couple of issues with the book. Rare is the book that I don’t have issues with, right? But both are small.

First up: the pointless, gratuitous, disgustingly-described vomiting scene. Maybe it’s getting old to hear me harp on about this, but in all honesty it’s become almost a cliché of YA lit to have a vomiting scene. Every frickin’ book has one! I know I’m more sensitive than most people about this, but seriously, enough already!!! It’s the YA equivalent to the gratuitous, inappropriately-placed sex scenes thrown into most adult literary books in order to boost sales. A YA book can’t be a YA book anymore without a vomit scene. I’m bored as well as disgusted.

Second up: The ending was very abrupt. While the scene was powerful, it revolved around Tiny and his resolution. I didn’t feel like I got enough resolution for either Will Grayson. I would have liked two more chapters at the end to taper off into feeling closure. Maybe it’s just because I stayed up late to finish the book and I was tired by the end. That’s possible. But the end – not what happened, but when it happened – just came as a surprise for me.

Over all, I loved this book. I loved it even more when I dreamt about it all night, even when those dreams first combined with Germinal (which I’m still dreaming about weeks later) and all the characters went down into a coal mining pit, and then later combined with Passion Pit‘s “Sleepyhead,” so that “Sleepyhead” became the theme song to Tiny Dancer and got stuck in my head for days. Just some little tidbits to make this review more interesting. 😀

Note: Years later, all I have to do is see the cover of WGWG and “Sleepyhead” pops into my mind. Permanently associated. 😀

Posted in 2010, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Readathon: Fade, by Lisa McMann

fadeNote: I can’t talk about this book without spoiling the first in the series, Wake, so please skip this if you plan to read Wake. There will be no spoilers for Fade in this review.

Quick summary: Fade continues where Wake ends, with Janie and Caleb working as undercover agents while finishing up their senior year at school. Janie’s physical health is deteriorating as she delves more into dreams, and her relationship with Caleb starts to get rocky as well as they work on their newest case.

My thoughts: Much like with Wake, I’m in two minds here. Loved the plot. It was a very fun book, and very fast. Great for Readathon. But didn’t like the writing. This time it felt less like the bones of good writing that needed refining, and more like an imitation of the tone of the first book. The narration didn’t stick with Janie and instead periodically dropped into Caleb’s viewpoint. That was jarring. The rocky tension between Janie and Caleb was eye-rollingly silly. It felt contrived. I would have liked it better had they just been a regular couple without all the melodrama. In many ways, I liked Wake better – it certainly seems as if I’m complaining more here than I did on the other book. But in other ways, Fade was better. The case that they work on – that part was amazing. There weren’t so many twists, and the underlying themes were clearer. I liked that. So again I’m just half and half. I’ll probably read Gone at some point, but I’m in no hurry.

Posted in 2010, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Readathon: French Milk, by Lucy Knisley

frenchmilkQuick Summary: This is a memoir/diary/travelogue of the month Lucy Knisley and her mother spent in Paris. They rented an apartment and spent a month seeing the sights, eating French food, and generally getting to know themselves better. It’s also an early-20s coming of age story. Knisley is an artist and this is actually her journal – drawn and written – from when she was in Paris.

My thoughts: I absolutely adored this book! I thought I might, because Eva didn’t really like it and the two of us seem to have completely opposite tastes. While I was wary going in, the book really won me over. It was hard for me to think of the book as a real diary even though I knew logically that it was. As I read I kept thinking she’d captured the feel of living in France for a month so well, so realistically, and then I’d have to stop and think – Oh yeah, that’s because this is what she experienced! Having lived in France for 6 weeks myself when I was 20 (she was 21 going on 22), there were so many things I recognized and understood. Like when she drew strange things happening in the Metro station. Like all the descriptions of food (oh so yummy!). Like my favorite line from the book, which is my favorite because I had the exact same thought and wrote just about the exact same thing in my own journal from my stay in France:

I insisted we stop for a chocolat chaud at a little café. Gotta love a place that gives you sugar cubes with your hot chocolate.

Yes yes yes!!! I even kept the wrappers of the sugar cubes I got with my breakfast chocolat chaud in Aix, taped into my diary! I kept cracking up all through this book, both from recognizing things and because Knisley is really funny! But not just funny. Poignant, at times. Perfectly capturing the fear of becoming an adult, of transitioning from adolescence into independence. Fear of where you’re going in life. I could just hug this book! It was so good!

Posted in 2010, Adult, Visual | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Readathon: I Kill Giants, by Joe Kelly

giantsQuick summary: Barbara is a troubled kid who seems to live in a fantasy world where she is very powerful and kills giants. Really, she is fighting against a metaphorical giant at home…

My thoughts: I struggled with this one when I first started it. The panel-styling was difficult for me to understand, and the setting/time/scene seemed to change every few pages without any indication of change. One moment we’d be in Barbara’s house, the next with a group of people I’d never seen before on a different day altogether. I had a hard time following the plotline and I couldn’t relate to Barbara at all. I’ve never been the sort of person to transpose fantasy onto real life, so I couldn’t understand the places her imagination went. Jason asked me why I kept going if I wasn’t enjoying it. My answer: Ana praised this book so much! I had to know why! So I kept going, and by the end, I was not disappointed. I understood Barbara better and the parts where her secrets were revealed were touching and painful. While this isn’t my favorite GN ever, I can see why people love it. I’m glad to have read it.

Posted in 2010, Visual, Young Adult | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Readathon: Looking for Bapu, by Anjali Banerjee

looking-for-bapu-anjali-banerjee-paperback-cover-artQuick summary: Eight-year-old Anu is very close to his grandfather (Bapu) and doesn’t know how to cope when Bapu has a massive stroke and dies. He thinks if only he can do something – say the right words, perform the right actions – he might be able to bring his Bapu back to him.

My thoughts: At first I wasn’t sure about this one. I started reading it right after The Magician’s Elephant and it took me awhile to change my brain to accommodate the new sort of prose. Once I got into the story, though, I really loved the book. There was a scene near the end that made me cry, and I don’t cry easily at books. I get teary, but the tears usually don’t fall. They fell this time. The was so sweet and heartbreaking, but not too miserable to make it a depressing book. It had moments of humor and little places to rest all along it. And it had elephants!! Elephants are good! 😀

Posted in 2010, Children's, Prose | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Readathon: The Magician’s Elephant, by Kate DiCamillo

magicianQuick summary: A young boy seeks answers when a fortune teller comes to town. She tells him he must follow the elephant to find his sister. The boy thinks she can’t be right – there are no elephants in his town. And then a magician makes one appear…

My thoughts: I read The Tale of Despereaux in late 2008 and hated it. Absolutely loathed it. I felt bad for that, because it won so many awards and everyone else seemed to like it, but it just didn’t work for me. I’ve been scared to try any of DiCamillo’s other books, but Chris convinced me to try The Magician’s Elephant (helped along by the fact that I love elephants to pieces). I’m so glad I did because this was a marvelous book! Funny thing is, the writing is very similar to that in Despereaux, minus the annoying, condescending asides to the reader which bothered me so much. For some reason, it worked in this setting, when it didn’t in Despereaux (for me, anyway). DiCamillo threw all the pieces to the puzzle out and then gathered them together bit by bit. I loved every single character, and I loved how everything worked out. So yay for second chances! So far this 2nds challenge has been amazing!

Posted in 2010, Children's, Prose | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The Book of Flying, by Keith Miller

126348Pico lives in a city by the sea, an orphan, the wingless son of two winged parents. He makes a home in the unused library and falls in love with a winged girl. In order to make himself fit to live with her, he sets off on a journey to find The Book of Flying, which will teach him how to get his wings. This is an adult fairy tale, a coming of age tale where Pico collects stories about others and learns about himself as he journeys.

This is a joint-review with Kailana of The Written World.

***
Kelly: When you emailed me the other day to see if I was still going to be reviewing this book with you; I almost said no. I have tried to read it a couple times over the last couple years, so I only really agreed to read it because Ana (Nymeth) suggested it and I owned it. I had heard really good things about it, but for whatever reason was never able to get into it. Instead of answering you, I went and picked up the book to give it one more try. I am so glad that I did! I think you said you liked it, too, so it should be fun to review the book both enjoying it. Other than the potential buddy review, what lead you to this book? I give credit to Carl, who said great things about it, but I know that Chris read it somewhere in there, too. Since my initial reaction to the book changed a few times, I am curious to know what were your first impressions of the book?

Amanda: First, for the record, I did enjoy the book! It was actually very different from what I expected. I first heard about the book back when Chris did his readathon vlog back in October. It looked like such a neat book, and when I saw it at Half Price Books not long after, I grabbed it up. I decided to read it now because it seemed perfect for Once Upon a Time. I didn’t really have any idea what the book was about, though. I had vague notions of a fantastical journey, but didn’t realize it took place in a different world altogether. I thought it was illustrated all throughout, and not just on the chapter headings. At first, I wasn’t sure about the prose – very long and rambly sentences – but quickly I got into the rhythm and I very much enjoyed the book. I know you don’t want me to say it, but it reminded me of a fantastical version of The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho (which I didn’t hate like everyone else seems to). Epic journey, learning about yourself along the way, episodic stories…but I won’t harp on it. I promise. 😀 Why do you think you enjoyed it more on this third attempt than you did before?

Kelly: Yeah, I hated The Alchemist. When you told me it reminded you off it, I tried to remove that thought from my head. That being said, I can see what you mean. I probably wouldn’t have made the connection myself, because I try to forget that book exists, but I could see where you would get it from. That being said, it didn’t destroy the book for me that it reminded me of that book, so that’s always good! I am glad I am not the only one that had a few issues in the beginning with the prose. I actually think it might have been that which made it so hard for me to get interested in the book previously. It’s a weird writing style. I’d love to have a magic answer for why this book worked for me this time, but I honestly don’t know what it is. I am not sure if my mood changed, I felt bad because your buddy review partners were abandoning you, or was just determined to get through it this time. For whatever reason this time everything just clicked. I got used to the writing style, loved the references to books, and enjoyed the journey of this rather anti-social librarian going out and having magical adventures. What was your favourite part of the book?

Amanda: My favorite part…hmm…I guess I really liked the trio between Pico, the robber queen, and the minotaur. It was a very interesting dynamic and despite the monstrosity of many of the characters, I liked that we got to know them for who they really are rather than their evil reputations. I guess the whole book was like that. In some ways, it was an epic journey or quest towards a goal, but at the same time towards finding a Self. I liked that every character had their own story and was on their own journey. Each person that Pico met shared part of his path with him, and each went on their own way, to find their own Self and their own goal. Epic journeys are so often solitary, and in some ways this was set up the same, but I got the feel that there was no real solitude. Like when Narya tells Pico that he abandoned his story, so she’s going to take it and make it her own. She obviously doesn’t – she makes her own story instead – but it shows how interconnected our lives are. Whose story most intrigued you?

Kelly: I really enjoyed that Pico was in every chapter, but it was like it was a collection of stories. In each chapter you got to see Pico’s development as a character, but you also got to know a great cast of characters that backed things up. You got to know them and cared for them before the next chapter and another cast of characters appeared. I liked how each character had their own story, too. I had a day or so to think about the book and I am trying to think of which story intrigued me the most. I am not sure if I could say any one impressed me more than another. I think I just enjoyed different aspects of all the stories, so they were all fantastic stories. I mean, there is Narya who is a prostitute, but she has also written a fantastic novel. The robber queen had a tragic story. You want to hate her for some of the things that she has done, but at the same time you couldn’t help feeling sorry for her. The common theme throughout the book of reading added to the overall story, too. What did you think about Pico? Did you like him?

Amanda: I liked Pico a lot! Though he wasn’t from our world, he seemed so human, but he also wasn’t perfect. I like that he lost himself at one point and nearly gave up his quest because he was content. It makes sense. So many of us do that. I liked that he collected the stories and learned from them, even if they weren’t his. At the end, I found myself wanting to know more about what was going to happen to him now. The ending was…not what I expected from a fairy tale quest like this one. It took me by surprise, even though I was expecting some sort of irony. I suppose I should have seen it, given the clues that were put forth in the beginning of the book, but I was blindsided. What did you think of the way Miller ended the book?

Kelly: Yeah, the ending. I was going to ask you about it, too, so I am glad you brought it up first. I was surprised by the ending, too. I was a little worried that something like that was going to happen, but I still didn’t expect it. Even though it has been a couple days and I have been thinking about the book here and there, I still can’t decide if I liked the ending. Did you like it? I think it was my least favourite part of the book. It was a bit of a letdown, but that being said I don’t think I hated the ending. I guess it is just one of those things that I need to think about more before I make any sort of decision. I don’t know if I really answered your question. It’s also hard to talk about the ending without saying specifically how it ended. Anything else you wanted to talk about?

Amanda: I know what you mean about not wanting to give it away. Though I feel like the end was appropriate. It had balance, like the rest of the book. I felt like it was a good choice for an adult fairy tale, you know?

But I think that’s all I had to say too. I really enjoyed the book, loved the prose even though it took me a few pages to get into it, loved the thematic elements and the emphasis on books, stories, and self-evolution. It was a unique coming of age sort of story, and I’ll definitely be keeping an eye out for more of Miller’s work.

Kelly: Yeah, I can see your point about the balance. That’s why I didn’t really hate the ending. Maybe I have just been used to conventional fairy tales and need to read more adult ones!

I am glad I read this book. I look forward to more from Miller, too! Thanks for reviewing it with me!

Amanda: Thanks to you, too!!

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Selected Poems, by Marina Tsvetaeva

tsvetaevaThis book is a selection of Marina Tsvetaeva’s poems translated from the Russian. The poems cross a 25-year period, from about 1915 to about 1940.

As I’ve said before, I am not a very good judge of poetry. I dislike poetry and I usually don’t understand it. My goal this year is to read six books of it, both to try to teach myself how to understand it better, and because I feel like I’m really lacking in this area of my learning. Maybe if I can learn to read poetry, I can grow to like it. At least that’s the hope.

Unfortunately, this collection did nothing for me at all. I wanted to like it. Jason gave it a rave review and the information he gave about Tsvetaeva’s life made her sound fascinating. Maybe I ought to have read a biography instead. Instead, I part-read part-skimmed through this collection, starting off all eager, getting less and less so as I turned pages. I had planned to read slowly, a couple poems a day all month, but as none of the poems spoke to me, I just read faster to get through it. Not the way you’re supposed to read poetry, I know, but I couldn’t help myself.

Maybe it was just that it was a translation. Maybe it’s just not the sort of poetry I like. Maybe I just don’t know how to read it. I don’t know. But either way, in the end there were only two poems in the entire collection that were okay, and of those two, only one that I liked enough to quote:

A kiss on the head – wipes away misery.
I kiss your head.

A kiss on the eyes – takes away sleeplessness.
I kiss your eyes.

A kiss on the lips – quenches the deepest thirst.
I kiss your lips.

A kiss on the head – wipes away memory.
I kiss your head.

Ironically, Jason quoted this exact same poem in his review, which I didn’t realize until just now.

I wish I could have liked and understood this better. Again, Tsvetaeva seems like a fascinating woman and I would like to read more about her. But her poetry? *shrug* It just didn’t work for me, I guess.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Poetry | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, by JK Rowling

Harry_Potter_and_the_Goblet_of_Fire_Book_4-119187569179112It’s month four/book four in my hardback-paperback comparison of the Harry Potter series! As per always, there will necessarily be spoilers in this post, so don’t read this if you haven’t read Harry Potter and plan to!

I mentioned last month that book four, The Goblet of Fire, is my least favorite of the series. A lot of people were curious why, so I’m going to tell you all about that before I get into the comparison part of the review.

The Goblet of Fire was not my least favorite the first time I read through the series, back in 2005 after HP6 came out. I read all six books in a row, and my least favorite by far was The Order of the Phoenix. Since then, though, I’ve reread those first six books about 25 times each. I’ve gotten to know each of them very well, both in plot and in writing. Within a few repetitions, HP5 actually became one of my favorites. I started to understand why it was the way it was, and all the things that bothered and annoyed me the first time came to be things I loved. The exact opposite happened with Goblet.

Goblet is full of plot holes, inconsistencies, and bad writing. While it is the first book that begins to lift out of the younger trilogy, forming a bridge between the younger and older trilogies in the series, is suffers from massive problems. Like the 2nd and 3rd books, it tries to recap as much as possible from the earlier plot lines. By this point in the series, though, so much has happened that stuffing all that recap in feels tedious and unnecessary. I was really happy that Rowling gave up recapping for the most part in books 5-7. It’s not just the recapping that’s tedious, though. I can’t even say how many times certain phrases and descriptions are repeated in Goblet. Crookshanks is compared to a furry ginger cushion/rug probably at least 10 times. Hermione is described by her bushy hair every few pages. And if I never hear the phrase “taking a leaf out of someone’s book” again, I will be a very happy girl.

Part of the problem, I know, is that Rowling caught a major plot hole in the book and had to rewrite large portions of it. That caused the book to feel unfinished, manipulated, bent around, and contrived. And it didn’t even get rid of all the plot holes. Why does Crouch/Moody wait until the end of the year to send Harry out to the graveyard? He could do it in the beginning of the year, no problem. What does Voldemort mean when he tells Wormtail that with one more death they’ll have a clear path to Harry? There are no other deaths! Why is muggle-born Colin Creevey’s brother starting at Hogwarts? I’m thinking Mom might have a wizard boyfriend on the side if two of her kids turn out to be wizards…

I could go on, but you get the point. In the end, the reason I like this book least of all the others is that it’s inconsistent, riddled with plot holes, badly written, and transitional. It certainly is emotional – I cried the first time I read about Cedric’s death – and the older humor is just beginning to develop. These are good things. But overall, it’s not my favorite book.

Now, on with the comparison! There was actually quite a lot of change between the two books, though those changes didn’t start until near the end, around the time when Harry leaves Krum with mad-Crouch to look for Dumbledore.

First change/issue: Harry tries to use the password “Sherbet Lemon” to get into Dumbledore’s office. Now of course, this is what it’s supposed to be in the British version, but the American version was supposed to be changed to “Lemon Drop” to be consistent with HP2. I guess the American editors forgot to change that around in the hardback printing. It’s corrected for the paperback.

Second change/issue: On page 712 (HB), Dumbledore tells Snape and Sirius, “…unless the few of us who know the truth do not stand united, there is no hope for any of us.” This is clearly just an editing mistake, which is fixed to “who know the truth stand united” in the paperback edition (also page 712).

Third change/issue: This is a HUGE one that broadly effects many pages. When Harry’s wand connects with Voldemort’s, it regurgitates Voldemort’s spells backwards. The people he’s killed reappear in reverse order. They should be: Cedric, Frank, Bertha, Lily, and James. In the HB edition, James comes out before Lily. That was really weird to read because I’m used to the PB version (which has Lily come out first as she should). It was weird to see the little differences in descriptions between the HB and the PB version, and to see what stayed the same. Like for instance, the HB version says “because the man was the one [Harry]’d thought of more than any other tonight,” while the PB says “because the woman was…” The parents have their dialog lines switched around between the two copies, giving them different roles in Harry’s escape, and this change goes as far as to effect a passage of text 30 pages later, where Harry remembers how his mother/father told him what to do.

That’s about the extent of it, though! My Goblet of Fire review is over! Next month will be The Order of the Phoenix, which won’t have nearly as many exciting changes to look through. It was reading the HB version of Phoenix a couple years back that made me realize there were differences in the first place (as again I was used to the PB version), but I only remember one section being incorrect. Still, I’m going to read through it more carefully, combing for errors. See you next month!

Posted in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012, Children's, Prose | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment