The Silkworm, by Robert Galbraith

51zWmD6wlJL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_In this second Cormoran Strike novel, Strike takes on a case to find a missing husband. Owen Quine is an eccentric two-bit author whose latest work was rejected right before he disappeared. His wife believes he’s gone off in a huff – something not unusual for Quine – until Strike discovers his decaying, mutilated body. Now, he has to unravel the clues left in the unpublished novel to find Quine’s killer before the police charge his wife with the murder.

I enjoyed The Cuckoo’s Calling, the first Cormoran Strike novel, when I read it last year. It was not a novel I would have picked up on its own, being as I’m not really a mystery reader. I only picked it up after discovering that Galbraith was JK Rowling’s pen name. Because I enjoyed the first novel so much, however, I’m happy to say that I picked up The Silkworm for itself, and not for its author. This is exactly the right time of year (RIP!) to read a mystery, and a macabre mystery at that.

Honestly, I can’t say I enjoyed The Silkworm quite as much as its predecessor. The Cuckoo’s Calling wasn’t perfect – I remember being annoyed by the extra-long explanation of hows, whens and whys at the end of the book, for example – but I enjoyed the story and characters a lot. The Silkworm felt, for me, a bit stilted for the first half of the novel. There were a lot of conversations that didn’t quite feel real, particularly when Strike tried to subtly interrogate potential suspects and witnesses. I felt like the people he spoke to gave far more away than they would have in reality, particularly those in the police force. In addition, the sudden point of view shifts within the narrative (sometimes within a single paragraph) were jarring, and I often found myself trying to figure out whose thoughts/feelings were being explored.

The second half of the book picked up quickly, however. The interrogations became more natural, and I got used to the point of view switches (mostly). The case itself was fascinating, and I never had any idea who would end up being the killer. I loved the shark motif, particularly the way it circled back at the end. The various relationships in the book (romantic and otherwise) developed nicely, and left me looking forward to spending more time with these characters in the future. Also, I was impressed by the solid, straightforward way that transgendered issues were handled both in the text, and by the characters themselves. Lastly, there was no long expository explanation at the end of the book this time (yay!).

In the end, despite a rocky start for me, I really enjoyed the novel. I will definitely be keeping my eye out for further Strike novels.

Reread via audio in May 2017: Robert Glenister makes this book excellent. It no longer felt stilted, and all POV shifts sounded natural.

Posted in 2014, 2017, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Sunday Coffee – Reflections on 2009

All of my reviews from 2009, excepting a handful that have been lost since their original posting, are now transferred to this blog.

That was a big year for me in blogging. I only started blogging, then book blogging, in 2008, and only discovered the world of book blogs in the fall that year. 2009 marked a big turning point for me in blogging. It was the year I left group blogging, and started the original Zen Leaf. It was the year I joined 25 – 25!!! – reading challenges, and designed my own challenge (GLBT Reading Challenge) for 2010. It was the year I read 101 books by the end of June, and only slightly slowed my progress in the second half of the year, ending at 184 books. It was the first year I participated in Readathon and NaNoWriMo, both of which I loved. The year also marked a great reading shift for me, with the discovery of modern YA and the graphic novel medium.

Looking back over that year through reviews has been fun. I was a book blog child, delighted by new discoveries and new toys and new friends. When I think about all the years I’ve been reviewing books, 2009 stands out as The Ultimate Awesome Year, in addition to being The Year I Went Book-Crazy. Sure, there were times when I felt bogged down by challenge obligations, or when I read too fast, or when I felt guilty for not liking universally-beloved books. Mostly, though, the year was wonderful, and I remember it with a lot of fondness. Great books, great words, great friends.

Some of my favorites from 2009:

Posted in Book Talk | Tagged | 1 Comment

Love is Hell, by Multiple Authors

51u6qK9GPJL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_Love is Hell is a collection of five silly-spooky love stories (titles below) by Melissa Marr, Scott Westerfeld, Justine Larbalestier, Gabrielle Zevin, and Laurie Faria Stolarz. Westerfeld is one of my favorite YA authors, and I’ve enjoyed books by all five of these authors in the past, so I knew I had to pick this one up. I’m not generally a fan of short story collections, simply because it feels like reading lots of mini-books, and my brain gets tired when switching so quickly. This was only five, though, and I split the reading up over several days, so it worked for me.

Each of the stories is about love, with a paranormal or supernatural bent. The stories range from fairy folklore to ghost story to dystopia. Exactly as I would have expected, my favorite was Westerfeld’s. Of the five, it felt most like a complete story, rather than a short sketch of a full novel’s idea. While I enjoyed the others, they could be a bit jarring in how fast characters went from “you’re a stranger” to “you’re the love of my life.” They were fantastic ideas, but I think I would have preferred them in a slightly longer format. Westerfeld’s piece felt more like a short story that could be expanded but didn’t need to be.

Still, that’s not to say this wasn’t fun to read! It made for great cold-front reading, wrapped in a shawl and sipping at hot coffee. Each of the stories was different from the others in feel and content, making it the perfect kind of story collection to read. I remember them all individually and distinctly, rather than having them run together as has happened when I’ve read other story collections. Each story had very vivid images that I imagine will stay with me for some time.

ripnineperilshort

I wasn’t intending to participating in Peril of the Short Story, as I don’t read many of them, but between this book and the collection of Poe’s stories I have sitting on my desk, I think I will! This collection was a fun way to start.

Stories:
“Sleeping with the Spirit” – Stolarz
“Stupid Perfect World” – Westerfeld
“Thinner Than Water” – Larbalestier
“Fan Fictions” – Zevin
“Love Struck” – Marr

Posted in 2014, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Raven Boys by Maggie Stiefvater (audio)

ravenboysBlue Sargent lives in a family of psychics, though she has no (usable) magic herself. She’s been told since early childhood that if she kisses her true love, he will die, and therefore, she’s decided never to fall in love. Her fate, however, can not be outrun, and on St. Mark’s Day in her sixteenth year, Blue sees one of the soon-to-be dead: an Aglionby student, a Raven Boy, named Gansey. She shouldn’t see the dead – she has no magic – and the fact that she sees him means that she’s his true love, or she’ll be the one to kill him. Or both.

A couple years ago, I tried to read this book. The premise was interesting, and I loved that first creepy scene in the abandoned churchyard on St. Mark’s Day. Then I got to Chapter 2, where we meet Gansey and several of his friends, and I lost interest completely. They seemed completely typical of YA stereotyped male protagonists, and I didn’t want to spend any time on them. Recently, however, I heard Memory talking about how great this book is, this series is, and I thought hey, I might as well give it another chance during RIP season. And, because I’m generally more tolerant of books in audio format, I checked out the audiobook from my library.

So, so glad I did. Funny thing is, I got to Chapter 2 and had all those same thoughts about Gansey et al. But it was an audiobook, so I kept listening. (See? More tolerant.) After that moment, things got better. Much, much better. So much better, in fact, that I spent the better part of two days finding reasons to get up and walk, work, drive, whatever would allow me to keep listening.

Gansey, Ronan, Noah, and Adam grew into real people instead of just caricatures. Blue was fantastic, and watching her interact with these boys who came from a completely different world was priceless. (Especially the first time she and Gansey meet.) The paranormal parts were deliciously creepy, the twists caught me by surprise, and the story ended with enough closure to feel satisfied, but also enough left hanging to make me want to read more. Yes, I’ve already checked the next audiobook out from the library.

I think what I liked best about the book, though, is that it wasn’t just a ghost story. It touched on what it’s like to grow up in an abusive household and to know you’ll be homeless if you speak up. It discussed family and what truly makes up that word. It showed the agony of not knowing when something might go irrevocably wrong, after having lived through the nightmare once already.

Sometimes, Gansey felt like his life was made up of a dozen hours that he could never forget.

Stiefvater does all this without shoving any of the issues into your face. They are simply part of the fabric that makes up the characters’ lives, and in my opinion, that’s the very best way to approach heavy subjects. I was impressed, and now very much looking forward to The Dream Thieves.

Performance: This audiobook was read by Will Patton. Despite heavy dialectical accents – generally something I dislike in audiobooks – I enjoyed the performance and thought it was well done. Each character was distinct and recognizable, and I particularly liked the parts when more than one voice spoke at a time. Not something I’m used to in a single-cast audiobook.

Posted in 2014, 2015, 2017, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Landline, by Rainbow Rowell

41iHvwDY7GL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_Georgie’s marriage is on the rocks, but it’s always that way, so she doesn’t think much about it when her husband and children leave for Christmas at their grandparents without her. After all, she has to stay behind. She’s got an important deadline to meet, a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Only then, her mother and sister start talking about divorce and sympathy, and Georgie starts to wonder. And she can’t get a hold of Neal. He won’t answer his phone or call her back. In desperation, she tries the landline at his mother’s house. The Neal who answers, however, is the Neal from 15 years ago, the last time they broke up, the last time he left her at Christmas, before they were engaged or married or had children together. Now, she has a chance to make her marriage right – or prevent it from ever happening at all.

Let me get the squeeing out of the way immediately: I loved loved loved this book! I really liked Fangirl, and I enjoyed Attachments, but I loved Landline. It was the right book, the right moment, the right everything. It’s one of those rare books that went immediately to my have-to-own list, before I even finished it (and which stayed there after I was done). Yes. This book. This this book.

Hem. Squeeing aside, I should explain why this book was so good. Apart from the obvious – great writing, great characterization, great pacing, etc – the book was incredibly unique. I don’t mean the call-back-in-time sections, which I’ve read before, and which, honestly, I found a little predictable. I mean the way this book handled marriage and divorce and parenting and relationships.

I’ve read books about divorce before. I’ve read books dealing with the aftermath of divorce (from both parents’ and children’s perspectives). I’ve read books about certain things leading up to divorce – abuse, neglect, infidelity, substance abuse, midlife crisis, etc. I’ve read books where only one partner wants to make a marriage work. What I have never read about is a marriage falling apart just because. I’ve never read about a marriage that is failing even as both partners try to make it work. I’ve never read about two people who love each other but really aren’t terribly right or compatible for each other. I’ve never read about two people who are obviously not perfect and definitely have their negative sides, but who are also generally good people with good traits. I’ve never read about two people whose good traits bring out the worst in each other, even as they are trying their hardest to bring out the best. I’ve never read a book that is simultaneously hopeful and hopeless, about a marriage which is both doomed merely because of the partners’ personalities and destined to hold together by sheer will, happy or not. This was fascinating. And really, really touching on a personal level.

Everyone has moments in their marriage that aren’t very good, I suspect, times that seem hopeless even as you want things to work out. Marriages where the two partners have very incompatible personalities, where the good in one brings out the worst in the other, and vice versa, are particularly hard. There’s no person or event or action to blame when things go bad, because no one did anything, and you’re both trying as hard as you can. When what makes one person happy simultaneously makes the other miserable, what else can you do? Compromise so that you’re both unhappy, if there’s no way for you both to be happy at the same time? Give up, ripping your family apart in the process and then living without the person you love more than anyone in the world?

You don’t know when you’re twenty-three. You don’t know what it really means to crawl into someone else’s life and stay there. You can’t see all the ways you’re going to get tangled, how you’re going to bond skin to skin. How the idea of separating will feel in five years, in ten – in fifteen. When Georgie thought about divorce now, she imagined lying side by side with Neal on two operating tables while a team of doctors tried to unthread their vascular systems. She didn’t know at twenty-three.

Call it an unbalanced marriage – not broken, but the sort of marriage where you’re always having to tip the scales one way or another to try to stay on an even footing.

Things didn’t go bad between Georgie and Neal. Things were always bad – and always good. Their marriage was like a set of scales constantly balancing itself. And then, at some point, when neither of them was paying attention, they’d tipped so far into bad, they’d settled there. Now only an enormous amount of good would shift them back. An impossible amount of good.

That describes it exactly. And, as a person living in this exact kind of marriage, I know the trials, the difficulties, the determination it takes, and how hard, heartbreaking, painful it can be sometimes. Does it work? Can it work in the end? I don’t know, and one of the things I like about Landline is that it doesn’t answer the question. It only says you have to keep trying if you want to have the chance.

Nobody’s lives just fit together. Fitting together is something you work at. It’s something you make happen – because you love each other.

Everything in this book was so real, complete, accurate. I could say more. I want to say more. I want to throw the entire book at you in quotes. I haven’t even talked about the whole kids-destroy-everything-but-we’d-never-give-them-up bits, or the totally-accepted, non-traditional gender roles, or the I-am-superfluous-to-my-family parts. As I said before, this book hit me on every personal level possible. The right book, at the exact right moment. It instantly catapulted into my top books of the year list, and will most likely stay right at the top of that list.

Posted in 2014, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Sunday Coffee – Responsible Reader

New ImageThis week’s blog-task was to transfer across my reviews from April and May of 2009. As I said last Sunday, 2009 and 2010 were my two giant-reading years, so they will take me some time to transfer. I could get it done quicker, but I have so many other projects to work on. I don’t want to spend too much time throwing myself into blog maintenance, you know? I ended up doing a little extra this week, though, and adding June’s reviews as well. It was a hard week for me, with my aunt’s death, and I needed something I could focus on so that I didn’t focus too hard on grief. June of 2009 was an interesting month for books – not in a good way – and it gave me a lot to think about.

See, 2009 was the first year I got fully involved in the book-blogging community. I’d only really discovered that other book blogs existed in the latter half of 2008. When I discovered reading challenges? Well, I went a bit crazy, and signed up for Way Too Many. At first, I threw myself into completing them with an efficiency that was a bit dizzying. This is why I was reading something like 15-20 books a month! By the end of June, I’d completed nearly every challenge I signed up for (including the 100-books-per-year challenge, reaching 101 books by the month’s end). The result of reading like this? Total burnout. I only enjoyed 3 of the 20 books I read that June, and one of those was a reread.

It wasn’t as if all those other books were bad. Some of them were probably quite good, but I wasn’t in a place to appreciate them, because 1) I was reading too much and too fast, and 2) I was reading them only to fulfill specific criteria for book challenges. Many of them were books I never would have picked up if they hadn’t met that criteria. This is what got me thinking. As I transferred mediocre review after mediocre review, I realized: I was not a responsible reader back then. Not at all.

These days, I don’t read books that I don’t want to read. If I book doesn’t sound interesting, I won’t pick it up. If I pick a book up and the story or writing or premise doesn’t hook me, I don’t finish reading it. I don’t make myself read a little longer to see if it gets better. I don’t care if I abandon something on the very first page, or 10 pages before the end. I don’t read to fulfill any criteria except my own interest and enjoyment – and that means I also don’t read books simply because their authors, characters, or content is related to an important issue.

I completely understand the idea of needing to read diversely in order to diversify the market. In 2010, for example, I made sure at least half of my reading that year was by/about LGBTQ authors/characters/issues. But this active seeking out of specific issues – be it reading books by certain kinds of authors, or about certain kinds of subjects – led to the same sort of burnout as reading to fulfill arbitrary challenge requirements. Really, it’s no different than fulfilling a requirement, if the only reason I’m reading the book is social reform. For others, that may not be the case, but for me, to read this way makes me an irresponsible reader. It does no good for me to read and review a book I’m not enjoying simply because it meets XYZ criteria, no matter how important that criteria is (to me, or to others, or to society).

That’s not to say I don’t read or try to read a wide and diverse selection of books. I do. I specifically seek out books I enjoy by/about a diverse population. That’s the difference between now and previous years. After watching seven years of books slip into my brain and out through my fingers in review form, I recognize the times I am more and less responsible as a reader/reviewer. I don’t want to review books the way I did in June 2009. Those books deserve better than what I could give them. I was not the right reader for them. I knew that as I read them, and should have acted on it. It’s a lesson that took me years to learn, and I hope never to fall back into those old habits/mistakes again.

Posted in Book Talk | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Supernatural Enhancements, by Edgar Cantero

18782854I have finished my first RIP book! And let me just say, it’s always wonderful when an event like RIP starts out so well. This book? Absolute perfect opener.

When Ambrose Wells dies, his second-cousin-twice-removed inherits the house and all of its contents. The cousin, known only as A., only learns about Wells at this inheritance, and he travels from Europe with his companion – a mute, punk, teenage Irish girl named Niamh (“Neeve”) – to claim his new home and riches. The house, however, carries a dark secret that infects the occupants within.

That’s all I’m going to say about that. There is so much more, revealed slowly over diary entries, letters, audio recordings, advertisements, psychological sessions, book excerpts, and security cameras. Just when you think you might know where the story is heading, it turns out that you have no idea. There are so many false trails, and new revelations all the way up to the head-spinning epilogue.

I don’t even know how to begin to classify this kind of book. Part-mystery, part-thriller, part-horror, part-folktale, part-mysticism…I could just go on. It was one of the most unique books I’ve ever read, both in the story itself, and in its structure. About a quarter of the way through, I gave up trying to unravel everything and just went along for the ride. (Especially during the complicated cryptography sessions. I’m good at math and logic, but no.) The ride was awesome.

Back in 2008, I read several mystical/supernatural thrillers that left me dissatisfied, because they felt predictable and unoriginal. I mentioned in my reviews that I really wanted to find a book in that general genre that used religious, mystical, or supernatural phenomena in a new and different way, or which used a religious, mystical, or supernatural system that was new and different altogether. I never found one…until now. This is exactly what I was looking for. I have no idea if the systems laid out in here are based on real ones out in the world or not, but they were completely unknown to me, and brilliantly drawn. I am a happy and impressed Manda.

There is a lot left unsaid and unexplained in The Supernatural Enhancements – or, at least, it felt that way to me, but I concede that it’s possible a lot simply went over my head. That didn’t bother me, though. The ending, which again blew me out of the water, made me rethink the entire book. Rereading with the new information, of course, would clear up some mysteries, but I think the book was meant to be cryptic in some ways. I don’t think we’re supposed to know everything. That fits the themes of the book, and I like that, as a reader, I got to mirror the characters’ searchings and ignorance in a way.

So yeah. Great book, great opener for RIP. It made me a happy girl.

Posted in 2014, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments

Chasing Before, by Lenore Appelhans

16081764Disclaimer: Lenore and I have known each other through blogging for years, plus we’ve met in person several times and we talk on other social media sites. However, this review is as honest as I can make it, and I have attempted not to let any bias slip into my thoughts because of my friendship with the author.

Also: Necessary spoilers from the first book in this series, but I will include no spoilers from this book.

Okay. Now that that’s out of the way, I’ll begin! Chasing Before is the sequel to Level 2 (later re-titled The Memory of After). I enjoyed Level 2 quite a lot, especially the memory-flashing and Our Town themes, and I was quite looking forward to the next installment of the series. Chasing Before picks up not long after Level 2 ends. Felicia and Neil have chosen to move from Level 2 to Level 3, only once they get there, they realize things are very, very wrong. Some of the Morati have slipped through, making Felicia – and those around her – a target for violence. To add to her troubles, Felicia makes a startling discovery about her memories that cause her to question everything.

My feelings on this book were more mixed than with the first. I still enjoyed the book – and like the first one, read it in a single afternoon, until I was up way too late that night! I liked revisiting old characters, and the way memory-sharing was integrated into the story, so that the book had a similar feel to Level 2 even though Felicia was now on Level 3. I really liked some of the new characters as well, especially Brady and Furukama. While I predicted a lot of the events of the book ahead of time, there were several twists that caught me off-guard, especially the revelation about Felicia’s memories. That was a really cool direction to take the book.

On the negative side, there were two things that bothered me. Some of the events seemed to happen really fast. I don’t want to give away spoilers, but particularly in the beginning, several characters die not long after we meet them. I liked those characters, and feel like if I’d had just a little more time to get to know them, I could have mourned them the way surviving characters did. Because I barely spent any time with them, however, I didn’t really feel anything at their deaths. The second was that I really, really didn’t like Neil in this book. He was an ass for about 75% of the book. Honestly, I kinda wonder if that’s how I was supposed to feel, and I do love the fact that he’s the sort of character not often seen in secular fiction (a purity-pact, extremely devoted Christian), even if he drove me (and Felicia) crazy because of his beliefs. I’m glad he starts to redeem himself by the end of the book.

On a personal note, the ending of Chasing Before really made me uncomfortable. I want to stress that this isn’t a negative. I cannot reveal specifics without spoiling the book, so I’ll give a somewhat-related example to explain my feelings. (Notably, this will contain a mild spoiler from Mrs. Craddock by William Somerset Maugham.) In Mrs. Craddock, the (married) narrator receives a letter from a man she almost had an affair with. She knows the letter will tempt her, and so she keeps it for a long time without ever opening or reading it. Eventually, when it no longer tempts her, she throws it away unread. This made me incredibly uncomfortable. I’m a “give me ALL the information” kind of girl. I wanted to know what that stupid letter said! Those who have read Chasing Before will understand what bothered me about the ending now. Again, it isn’t that the book had a bad ending – it was actually a very courageous ending, I think – it just gutted me a little on a personal level, and makes me 1) hope that volume 3 will give me a chance know more, and 2) want to beg Lenore for more information, haha! I won’t do that though. I’m a good reader.

Looking forward to the next book in the series!

Posted in 2014, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Top Ten Characters at my Lunch Table

Ooh, great question! And difficult to narrow down to ten. Hm. I’m not sure my top ten characters would all love to be at a table with each other (or me, for that matter), but I guess all that matters is that I want them there, right? Right.

Okay. My top ten lunch-table character friends, in no particular order:

final-empire1 & 2. Vin and Elend from Brandon Sanderson’s Mistborn series – I love these guys so much. Vin would hate sitting at a table with everyone else, so I’ll let her and Elend sit at the end so she can keep an eye out on everyone. Heehee.

3. Katniss Everdeen – Most people found her irritating by the end of the Hunger Games series, but I just grew to love her more and more, even when she was damaged. She’d be welcome at my table. Either she can sit near Vin and they can watch everyone together, or they’ll have to sit at opposite sides, most suspicious of each other.

4. Ginny Weasley – I debated. Ginny or Luna? Both would be great choices, but I think in the end, my lunch table needs less of the whimsical and more direction. Also, I think Ginny and I could get along really well.

DSB_final_6_15 & 6. Karou and Zusana from Daughter of Smoke and Bone – Karou, with her turquoise hair and crazy (but true!) stories, would be great at my table, and Zusana? Well, Zusana is amazing, 100%. She’s got to come. If she’d consent. I might have to offer her something tasty.

7. Sturmhund from the Grisha trilogy – There are actually a whole cast of characters from this series I’d love to sit at my table, but if I had to pick one person to bring the whole group together, it’d be Sturmhund. He’d even disarm Vin and Katniss, though he’s probably the one they ought to suspect the most.

71sst0-sdEL8 & 9. Howl and Sophie – The dynamic duo from Howl’s Moving Castle has absolutely got to come. And yes, I’m still just a tiny bit in love with Howl. Yes. I’ll try not to stare at him too starry-eyed, or else risk Sophie’s wrath.

10. Lord Henry from The Picture of Dorian Gray – I just now realized there’s only one person from classic lit who will be sitting at my table. Given that he’s much older than all the rest and from a completely different kind of world, I imagine he’s pretty uncomfortable. Hey, it’s Lord Henry, though, and I’m sure he’ll come up with plenty of words to explain it all to himself and befuddle his lunch-table neighbors at the same time.

topten

Top Ten Tuesday is hosted by The Broke and the Bookish.

Posted in Book Talk | Tagged | 4 Comments

Sunday Coffee – The Most Wonderful Time of Year

coffeeAutumn. I know, I know, technically it’s not autumn, but for me, this is the beginning of the autumn season. There is so much to look forward to over the next few months. Carl’s RIP event, of course, which I’m over-the-top excited about. (Obviously.) There’s the changing of the seasons, which will be far more dramatic here in Massachusetts than in Texas. There’s the boys going back to school this week after a long, long summer. And soon, the NaNoWriMo season will start. I’m looking forward to meeting and getting together with local writers, as well as to writing again. I haven’t written any fiction since June!

This time of year just makes me feel alive! I have so much energy, and so much I want to do. Hopefully that means I can be really productive in getting this blog fully up to date! I managed to get through the first quarter of 2009’s reviews this week. Both 2009 and 2010 were my giant reading years – 184 and 217 books respectively – so that’s a lot of reviews to transfer. It’s a little tedious, but at the same time, I’m enjoying it. Early 2009 is when I first discovered modern young adult fiction. When I was an adolescent, there wasn’t much in the way of good YA, and discovering the new stuff was quite a lot of fun. I read some good ones in there, including my first reads from Scott Westerfeld and Maureen Johnson and Deb Caletti, all of whom I love. It was a good time for books in general, with some fantastic adult fiction, classics, and nonfiction, too. Some of my favorites of the quarter include The Eyre Affair, Uglies, Ella Minnow Pea, Habibi, The Good Earth, and Harry, a History.

Next week, I hope to get another big portion of 2009 up to date, as well as begin my next writing project after the kids get back into school, and start up my exercise program again. I’m nothing if not ambitious, right? Ha!

Posted in Book Talk | Tagged | 1 Comment