Keeping You a Secret, by Julie Anne Peters

KeepingYouASecretPicHolland has never really thought about her sexuality before. She lives in an area with small-town mentality and she knows no one who’s gay – until Cece shows up at school for Holland’s last semester of her senior year. Cece is out and proud, which sets off ripples at school, ripples that range from harassment to vandalism. But worse are the ripples set off in Holland, who finds herself falling desperately in love with this girl.

While I didn’t love this book as much as Between Mom and Jo, it was excellent. With each step I found myself more deeply wound into the story. I experienced the wonderful feeling of falling in love alongside Holland. I understood Cece’s fear at the anger all around her. I watched with trepidation as Holland’s mom treats Cece as a child molester or pervert. I couldn’t put down the book. It got so late, and I still kept reading page after page after page. The last third of the book made me shake with anger and cry in pain. Not as much as with Between Mom and Jo, but still, it was enough.

The book, I think, was meant to reach GLBT teens, but honestly I think every parent should read it. They should read it and think about the way they’ll react if their child comes out as gay. They should know what their child faces among their peers, from their teachers, and from the community. They should learn about the hostility and isolation involved. It is eye-opening.

I don’t want to say more and give away spoilers, but I encourage you to read it. It is so good. I have a feeling all of Julie Anne Peters’ books will be good and I’m glad I own so many. I’m really looking forward to the next one.

Posted in 2010, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Freshwater, by Virginia Woolf

woolf y goreyNot many people know that Virginia Woolf dabbled in drama. Even Wikipedia has the information listed incorrectly for this play. Woolf originally wrote it around 1923 and later resuscitated the play in 1935 for performance with the Bloomsbury group. Jason found this book for me a couple years back. The edition contains both the 1935 and 1923 versions of the play, with notes, and it’s illustrated by Edward Gorey. How much more perfect could it be?

Despite that, I didn’t read it right away, because I was scared of it. I knew it said, “Freshwater: a Comedy” on the front, but I had a hard time imagining Ms. Woolf as comedic. While I love her, her books take a lot out of me. I usually can only read one a year, and I get in a bit of a funk afterwards when I do. But it’s been sitting on my shelf for too long now and I really wanted to get to it.

The play is a spoof about the life of Woolf’s great-aunt, Julia Cameron, who was a famous photographer. It also features George Watts, Ellen Terry, and Alfred Lord Tennyson as key characters. Yes, they all knew each other. It was a small world.

The 1935 version of the play, the one that was performed, was presented in the book first. It was laugh out loud funny, especially the parts with Tennyson. I had no idea Woolf could be so funny. I imagine watching this would be even better, and since it was a family affair, probably even funnier to them. The cast list, written in Woolf’s hand, is included in the book, and even Leonard Woolf’s pet monkey got his own part in the play (“the marmoset”). It only took half an hour or so to read, even with pauses to laugh and read out lines to Jason.

The 1923 version came after all the indexed notes, and it was not anywhere near the brilliance of the later version. It’s easy to see Woolf had no idea what she was doing when it came to writing her first play. Every time someone spoke, it was a long monologue. The play was a weird contrast of serious, tragic, and comic. It didn’t flow very well. She did a lot of work shaping the play up for the performed version.

And then there were the illustrations. Well, it’s Edward Gorey. I couldn’t ask for better. They were just a neat little touch that added dimension to the book and made it that much more enjoyable.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Drama | Tagged | Leave a comment

Crime and Punishment (graphic novel), by Fyodor Dostoyevsky

823077I have not read the original version of Crime and Punishment. To be honest, I’m quite scared of it. When I was really young, I heard that C&P and War & Peace were the two long, tough, boring Russian novels (I think I heard this from Charlie Brown, actually…), so that set in me a fear of these two books. Even though I’ve read lots of Russian novels now, including chunksters like Anna Karenina, I’m still terrified of C&P and W&P.

I sort of have a reason to be, because there are very few Russian authors that I’ve enjoyed. I like Nabokov, but he hardly counts. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich was good. The Death of Ivan Ilyich and Fathers and Sons were okay. Other than that, I think I’ve hated every other Russian book I’ve tried to read. Dr. Zhivago. Anna Karenina. And so on.

So when I saw this graphic novel adaptation of Crime & Punishment, adapted by the same person as Kafka’s The Trial and published in the same line, I decided to give it a try. I hoped it would induce me to brave the original version. Unfortunately, I think it has done the exact opposite.

The graphic novel adaptation sets the story in modern Russia, but other than that, it supposedly makes no plot changes from the original. Obviously I can’t verify that. I recognize Russian literature traits in it. Sideplots that come out of no where and have very little to do with the main plot. Philosophical discussions and train of thought. Heavy emphasis on politics. None of these things make me want to read the chunkster version of C&P. I also didn’t like the characters – they were all just lowlife criminals – and I’m pretty sure I’d feel the same in the real book, too. I don’t want to waste my time reading about people I’d hate. I know in the end that’s not probably what I’m supposed to feel about the characters, but I do. I just have no sympathy with people who are smart enough to turn their minds in circles in order to justify low living, no matter what their government is like.

Also, though it’s been a week, thinking about this GN still makes me sick to my stomach because it depicted several scenes of drug use (that whole modernization thing) and I have a phobia of that sort of thing. It’s worse in graphic form. I wish I hadn’t read it at all. I’m trying to forget.

That’s all. It’s probably bad of me to dismiss the real book based on the GN, but I am. I’ve never been overly fond of Russian lit and I have a different book by Dostoevsky that I actually want to read. I’ll stick to that one.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Visual | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Machine Stops, by EM Forster

the_machine_stopsMan, the flower of all flesh, the noblest of all creatures visible, man who had once made god in his image, and had mirrored his strength on the constellations, beautiful naked man was dying, strangled in the garments that he had woven.

This was a powerful novelette. In 1909, Forster outlined a future world where the human race has moved underground. Each person lives alone, breathing artificial air, eating artificial food, and given everything they want or need by The Machine. Their only interactions with the world or other human beings are through “cinematophotes” (essentially TVs) and fuzzy videoconferencing (like Skype). In the story, Forster seems to ask: What happens to man when he becomes dependent on the technology he creates, and what happens if, as the title suggests, The Machine stops?

I really enjoyed this story even though I’m not usually a fan of science fiction, especially early 20th century science fiction. Forster does an excellent job sketching out this world for the reader. He also brings up so many good points. Early on, I was struck with the uncanny similarity of their world to ours today. I mean, of course we don’t live underground and breathe artificial air, but we are so dependent on technology. We have artificial food (of a sort). We are all growing fat with our dependency on machines to take care of us. Instead of going out, more often we are stay right in our comfortable place at home and talk to people online.

I don’t personally think technology is a wholly bad thing. I think in some ways, Forster and other writers like him were just paranoid and frightened of change. The technology we have expanded in the last 100 years has done amazing things for our society, even if it has hurt us in some ways. I think about all the friends I have made through blogging, for instance, people who I connect with more than I’ve connected with anyone in years, and I can’t think the internet is a bad or dangerous thing. It is a wonderful thing, to connect with so many people in so many places. I honestly believe it brings us all closer together, even if we don’t have to leave our living rooms in order to connect. For example, I can talk over Skype with my sister in Palestine or my in-laws in Wisconsin, which wouldn’t have been possible a decade ago.

And sometimes, every once in awhile, we do get to leave our living rooms and connect in person. I met 4 different bloggers in person for the first time in the last 6 months, and I hope to meet more this coming May. In 2007, I met up with tons of different friends I’d made on myspace when I traveled twice to NYC. It was a wonderful experience. I think sometimes those people so scared of technology were afraid that we would take it and no longer need anything else, and I think that fear is unfounded. Nevertheless, it still was eerie to read his predictions, especially when they tended towards a Wall-E like society. One character, for instance, expressed how strong he’d made himself by exercising in his room. His proof: he could hold his pillow up in front of him for 10 seconds. !!!

Moving on. Forster also made really interesting points about religion, which had been abolished as superstition by the culture who moved underground. The thing about humans, though, is they tend to like to worship, and when one god is destroyed, they invent another. They worship the thing that gives them life, and in this case, that’s The Machine. Unfortunately, The Machine is just a machine, and a man-made one at that, so it’s not infallible. And if you believe it’s a god, then how are you going to react as it slowly deteriorates (I’m having Ella Minnow Pea flashbacks here)? When it is such an enormous part of your life, how are you going to escape its destruction?

The story is not without its flaws, flaws that seem to be common in turn of the century science fiction (from my experience anyway). There is a lot of telling when I would have preferred showing. There is heavy emphasis on specific aspects of the technology without any clarification of how they worked. Little things. But for the most part, the story was gorgeously written and really made me think. Since I was a little disappointed in reading Forster’s A Passage to India last fall, this has renewed my faith in him. Must go read Howard’s End or A Room With a View now.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Great Expectations, by Charles Dickens

great expectationsA couple years back, I read A Christmas Carol. It was my first encounter with Charles Dickens, and I was not impressed. In fact, I absolutely hated the book and it took me weeks to get through it. His language was convoluted, arcane, and lifeless. His characters had no depth. I couldn’t hear his voice. If I hadn’t needed to read it because I was moderating a book club discussion about it, I would have quit. Since then, I’ve been scared of Dickens, though I was determined to one day read both Great Expectations and Bleak House.

For my family book club this month, Jason chose Great Expectations for me. I was a little scared but at the same time resigned. I went into the book knowing just about nothing. I’d heard of Miss Havisham in her worn out bridal dress with her rotted wedding cake and her stopped clocks, but that was all. I’m not going to say anything more about the plot. I liked not knowing anything. It made the book all the more interesting once I began. It was not at all what I expected.

I found out I was wrong about Dickens. Maybe A Christmas Carol was dull, convoluted, arcane, lifeless, and all the rest, but not this book. Great Expectations was surprisingly easy and fun to read. It was like an adventure novel much of the time. A pot-boiler. While there’s depth in studying the book, it’s really quite easy to read just surface level for plot. I can see why people waited month after month for the next installment. I wish I could have read it like that, actually, because I think some of the book’s flaws would have been less apparent to me if it was segmented out.

The flaws were all ones that you always hear about Dickens. There are unbelievable coincidences. People are rescued at the very last second. Everyone turns out to be interconnected. There was also a problem with the middle third of the book being a little dull, as if Dickens got a bit of writer’s block but had to keep producing. But the book went beyond its flaws. I expected there to be a certain amount of caricature in characters such as Miss Havisham, but Dickens did really well to flesh all the main characters out (I won’t comment on side characters). They had life and personality. They experienced a myriad of feelings and they grew as people over time. There was less moralizing than I expected, and less chauvinism.

And the book was funny. I didn’t expect it to be so funny. Honestly it reminded me a lot of Jane Austen’s humor, especially in the little digs on individual characters. Compare, for instance, Dickens’ poking fun at Pumblechook and his “May I?”s and shaking Pip’s hand over and over, with Austen’s digs at Mr. Woodhouse and him saying “Poor Miss Taylor” in every single one of his scenes in Emma. The only difference, really, was Dickens seemed to know when to stop the joke, whereas Austen runs them into the ground in every one of her books.

It was not my favorite classic ever, but for the most part I really enjoyed Great Expectations. I’m glad Jason pushed me to read it. I’m also less scared of Bleak House now, despite its length. I actually want to see if I can find out what schedule it was released on so I can read it the way it was originally published. That would be fun.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Prose | Tagged | 1 Comment

Native, by Mona Kuhn

Kuhn_Native_0I spent a lot of January studying and reading about Brazil, and supplemented all this by reading Native, a book of photography by Mona Kuhn. Kuhn is from Brazil and returned to it after being away for twenty years. The book is like a journey. The pictures depict the rainforest at different times of the day, architecture, furniture, running water, and the human body, both male and female. The composition of each picture was stunning, as well as her use of color. I’d read my friend Chris’ review of this book a few months ago and immediately knew I wanted to read it. I couldn’t find it anywhere in town, though, and was so grateful when Chris passed it to me when I was in New Orleans. I’ve looked through it several times now.

Kuhn’s website has so much more information about her and her work all over the world. It includes a couple pictures from Native as well as a huge portfolio of other work. In the Bio section, it has some interviews and information about how she works. I spent several hours going over her website and absorbing. I think I must find some other books of hers.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Visual | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Impossible, by Nancy Werlin

impossible_bookHow do I even begin to describe this book without giving anything away? Um…Lucy Scarborough is a seventeen year old girl with two wonderful, loving foster parents and a real mom who is completely crazy and who shows up randomly sometimes. Each time she comes, she sings a version of Scarborough Fair, which she’s dubbed The Elfin Knight. Through a series of events I’m not going to talk about at all, Lucy begins to pay more attention to the ballad. She needs to unravel the puzzle her mother has given her. Her life and sanity depend on it.

I read Heather’s review months ago, but I must not have remembered much from it, because the content of this book came as a total shock to me. In a good way. I sat down to read this one afternoon and couldn’t put it down until I finished near midnight. I’ve had a couple bad experiences with YA lately, books with shallow premises or flimsy plots, but this was nothing like that. The characterization was solid and thick. The plot was slow enough to let me languish over it but also wasn’t dull. I could never guess what was going to happen – in fact, I thought I had much of the puzzle figured out and turned out to be completely wrong. There’s actually one place I wish I’d been right, but I can’t talk about it for spoiler’s sake. Agh! Good thing this is my YA book club selection this month so I’ll be able to discuss it in depth soon. 🙂

I really don’t want to give anything away, but let me just say that while this has fantasy elements to it, it is grounded in reality as well. It deals with some tough subjects, particularly among teens, and does justice to them. At the same time, it delves into old folk legends and mythologies and weaves them into real life. It was beautiful.

No, it wasn’t perfect. There were a couple places that felt contrived, like Werlin was trying to stuff in some backstory and didn’t know how to do it. I felt that particularly when it came to Lucy reading her mom’s diary (the diary format really doesn’t work for me unless it’s extremely well done and believable). But other than these little snatches of forced exposition, the prose is delightful, easy to read, and a lot of fun.

What else can I say? Go read it. It’s a good one! 🙂

PS – If you know the Simon and Garfunkel version of Scarborough Fair, you’re likely to have it in your head all day after reading this. I certainly did. Good thing I like the song!

Posted in 2010, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged | Leave a comment

Tales From Outer Suburbia, by Shaun Tan

talesThis is a picture-book collection of 15 short stories.

So far, this is my least favorite book by Shaun Tan, and that’s really just because it’s a SS collection. Like other collections, I felt rushed and overwhelmed reading it, even though I spread it out over 4-5 days. Because I read it as a whole, I don’t think I got as much out of the stories as I would have had I read them separately. However, I own the book, which means I’m going to be able to go back and revisit stories individually over time. When I say it’s my “least favorite,” I still liked the book. I’m glad I have it. I want to go try to read a story a week or so and just languish over them. I have a feeling I’ll like the book much better after doing that.

There was only one story I didn’t really like, which was “The Amnesia Machine,” and that was only because it was on such a busy panel that I couldn’t take everything in. I don’t even know what it was about. My favorite stories were “Broken Toys,” “No Other Country,” and “Distant Rain.” “Broken Toys” is about monsters and reunions and getting to understand people better. The book’s cover art comes from it. “No Other Country” is about a family trying to settle into life in a new place and what they discover there in the midst of their sorrows. “Distant Rain” talks about what happens to the poetry we write but never let anyone see. All three were touching stories and beautifully illustrated.

Posted in 2010, Adult, Visual | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Red Tree, by Shaun Tan

redtree1Fair warning – I want to discuss what this book means to me, which means I will talk about everything, including the end. While the book is more about the journey and less about what happens, if you don’t want spoilers, you’ll want to skip this.

The Red Tree is a tiny chidren’s picture book focusing on depression. It follows a girl as she wakes up with nothing to look forward to and is consumed by darkness, until the end of the day when she finds the red tree. I had to read the book twice to really understand my feelings and interpretation of it. I’m going to walk through what I felt while reading.

First, I picked up the book on a day that I felt awful. I hadn’t slept, I was carrying huge depressing loads inside me, and the day started with one of my kids having a stomach virus. Not fun. I had a headache all day and needed to sleep. I took the book back with me to read before I tried (and failed) to take a nap. By that point, I was already on the verge of tears. I flipped the book to the back cover and read the words, “sometimes the day begins with nothing to look forward to”. And I cried. Immediately.

I took this book to read in particular because Chris had told me several times that this was his go-to book when he’s depressed or upset, and I thought – that’s exactly what I need. Something that will help me here in this mood. So I began to read. The book starts with the same opening line and only gets worse. Each new page is a new look at the way depression feels. It was miserable and heartbreaking, but strangely comforting in the sense that I could relate to it at that moment. I went along this journey with the unnamed little girl.

But then came the last two panels, which say, “but suddenly there it is / right in front of you / bright and vivid / quietly waiting // just as you imagined it would be”. On the first panel, the girl finds a bright red leaf (in contrast to the black dead leaves floating down over her when she woke up), and in the second, that leaf has grown into a glowing, beautiful red tree that she smiles up at.

I admit, those panels were really jarring after the dark, melancholy ones before. I didn’t quite understand. My first thoughts were that the panels were dishonest, because when you’re depressed, there is no magical solution to come along and just fix things. Only I wasn’t sure, because twice in my life now, in the spring of ’99 and the fall of ’07, a magical solution did come to me unexpectedly and lifted years worth of burden. And sometimes that happens. It’s unpredictable and uncommon, but it happens. So I was conflicted about the end.

Then I saw Jason and Chris discussing their thoughts about the book on Twitter. Jason felt the end implied that people who were depressed were being told they ought to just find something happy and “get over it.” He really hated the ending, though he loved the rest. Chris felt more like it was saying there were good things all over and this was taking time to look at them. (Sorry guys, I’m paraphrasing you, hopefully not misrepresenting you!) Their thoughts made me think, because I was right in the middle of them. An idea kept spinning in my head and then I made a decision. I needed to go back and reread.

I reread it that afternoon, slowly, and on each page I looked. On each page, there was a red leaf. Sometimes partially obscured, sometimes in plain sight. But always there, even though the little girl didn’t see it. And in seeing this, the end was no longer so jarring. I realized how I interpreted that tree:

There are beautiful things around us that we usually cannot see when we are so consumed with depression. Every once in awhile, though, we will catch sight of one, and when we do, it will not seem like a little thing. That red leaf, that tiny beautiful thing, will feel so much more, like a Red Tree, in contrast to all the other misery in our lives. And that happy thing that feels so wonderful – what happens to it overnight? Well, sometimes it dies, and the leaves turn black and rain down on us by the time we wake up. That is the fleeting nature of happiness when we suffer from depression. But still, there is a happy spot to grasp at in every place in our lives, if we can manage to see it. We usually won’t, but when we do, it is a beautiful thing.

I love the ending now. I understand it so much more, and I feel such a connection to this book. This is one I want to keep with me forever. I’m really happy I was able to sort through my thoughts and make the book my own.

Posted in 2010, Children's, Visual | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, by JK Rowling (+ Philosopher’s Stone)

harrypotter-book1I reread the Harry Potter series at least once per year, and have since I first read it in the summer of 2005, after the sixth book came out. For the first couple years after that first read, I actually read the series a lot. Over and over again. When we were in the process of moving, they were the only books I had available to read, so I read them on a loop. End result? I’ve now read the first 6 books about 25 times each, and the 7th about 10 times since it came out.

I joined the Harry Potter Reading Challenge not to give me an excuse to reread the books, but because I’d realized last spring that the hardback and paperback editions of books 5 and 6 were different. When corrections to the text were made between initial printing and paperback printing, those corrections were only reflected in the paperback version. So I decided to use this challenge to cross-compare all the books. I have each one in HB and PB. I’ve always read the first 5 in PB, the last 2 in HB, simply because that’s what I ended up buying. This round, I’m reading the first 5 in HB, the last two in PB, and making notes on the differences.

And actually, there is no difference between versions of the first book. As far as I can tell – and I fairly well have the books memorized by this point – the two versions were exactly the same. It’s possible I missed something, but probably not anything big. Because that left this post completely empty of anything to talk about, I decided to do an additional comparison. I read the British version of the book!

This was my first time through Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, and it was quite fun to read. There were all the differences that you’d expect: single instead of double quotes, word differences like chips, crisps, and jumpers instead of fries, chips, and sweaters. Those things I expected. There were a few places that threw me off.

  • “the baker’s opposite” instead of “the bakery”
  • baby-Dudley learning the word “Shan’t” instead of “Won’t” which cracked me up. “Shall” is such a snobbish word in the US, so imagining a baby yelling “Shan’t” is hilarious.
  • Sherbert Lemons instead of lemon drops – I wonder if this is the same sort of candy?
  • the fact that anytime something is taped, it has to be “sellotaped.”
  • Hagrid writes to Dumbledore as “Mr. Dumbledore” instead of Professor Dumbledore once. It’s only that way one time in the whole book, which makes me wonder if it was a mistake that was corrected in the American edition.
  • A couple places had the word order changed around, or dialog broken into 2 lines instead of four.
  • Dean Thomas is not sorted in the British version. He’s skipped altogether, and as that’s when the text tells you he’s black, it doesn’t surprise me that those outside the US didn’t realize he was black. That includes the people making the movie, who were really surprised to find that out. Him not being sorted, however, makes sense of the error in the American text, though, which says there were only 3 people left to be sorted and then goes on to sort Dean Thomas, Lisa Turpin, Ron Weasley, and Blaise Zabini.
  • Does the UK still do measurements not in the metric system? I thought all the references to feet and such would have been different, but they weren’t. The Quidditch goal posts, for instance, were still 50 feet high.
  • “Revising” means “studying” in the UK – I’d never heard that before. It felt really weird to read that over and over, I kept thinking they were making edits to their homework…

There wasn’t too much different other than British-isms changed to American-isms. Just Dean being left out of the sorting and a couple paragraphs switched around (like where Dean is yelling Red Card at Madame Hooch in the first Quidditch game). Oh, and the back-of-book description is just a bit weird. There’s also an illustration and I can’t figure out who it’s supposed to be. Anyone care to fill me in?

HarryPotter6

Overall, it was fun to read the original.

***
– November 2014 throwback review

Posted in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, Children's, Prose | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment