The Titan’s Curse, by Rick Riordan

250px-The_titan's_curseThe third installment of the Percy Jackson series (which began with The Lightning Thief) is The Titan’s Curse. Halfway between two summers at Camp Half-Blood, Percy gets roped into following a quest of fellow half-blood Thalia, daughter of Zeus. Kronos is still stirring, getting stronger; Artemis and her hunters become entwined in the plot; and we get to meet Atlas for the first time – he’s rather bitter about his lot, understandably.

Like the second book, The Sea of Monsters, this book just didn’t live up to the first. Halfway through, I asked myself why was I still reading this series. It’s no where near as good as something like Harry Potter, I didn’t really care about the characters, and I was getting bored. Plus there was the occasional “fart-arrow” type humor which I really just hate. After the first half, though, the plot picked up, and I finished quickly to move on to the fourth book.

Posted in 2009, Children's, Prose | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury

fahrenheit451Fahrenheit 451 is the ultimate banned book – a book about banning books to the degree of burning any that are discovered, as well as the house of the owner who concealed them. Firemen in this dystopian world don’t mess around. They start the fires, not put them out. Their world is pretty scary, especially when they reveal the history of how this censorship came about. Most of it has to do with TV and extreme political correctness. People had stopped reading before books were ever banned.

This book is classic old-style dystopia. It’s very political and it critiques society, but there isn’t much in the way of character development. The message is clear-cut: censorship is not pretty. It’s a bad thing. There wasn’t much beyond that. It was a lot more straightforward and a lot less deep than I imagined it would be.

I’ve spent years avoiding this book. In middle school, they showed us the film version, and the scene with the woman burning alive alongside her books disturbed me so much that I grew a passionate hatred for the entire concept of Fahrenheit 451. Recently, I realized that without that young-teen bias, this would probably be a book I’d enjoy. I love dystopias, after all. So I decided to give it a chance, and the Banned Books Challenge this month gave me the perfect opportunity to do so. The verdict? In terms of personal enjoyment, it was much better than I expected, but not as good as some other dystopias I’ve read (especially character-oriented ones). On the other hand, politically it was a very interesting book.

The central irony in any dystopia is the presentation of the original world’s intention to create a utopian society. In many of these old-style dystopias, citizens are kept happy and peaceful by the lack of thought. The world of Fahrenheit 451 is meant to be perpetual fun and games. Constant mindless stimulation. No one thinks, and no one cares to. It’s only when the balance is upset that people realize that what they’ve lost is not worth what they think they have (that artificial happiness and peace). The layers are peeled back, and they realize this perfect society is actually a nightmare. The central character of this book starts as a fireman who loves to burn books before a chance encounter with a free-thinker upsets his world.

The most telling quote came from the section where the firechief tells the disillusioned fireman the history of why books came to be burned:

You must understand that our civilization is so vast that we can’t have our minorities upset and stirred. … Colored people don’t like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people don’t feel good about Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Burn it. Someone’s written a book on tobacco and cancer of the lungs? The cigarette people are weeping? Burn the book. … Forget them. Burn all, burn everything. Fire is bright and fire is clean.

Banned Book Week is coming up in the last week of September. It’s hard for me to imagine anyone really, honestly, actually wanting to ban books, but sadly, there are those sorts of people. Fahrenheit 451 remains eye-opening because of these people. If you don’t believe this issue is here and now, think about the two guys claiming to be part of some “Christian” group from Milwaukee: They are currently suing for the legal right to publicly burn the West Bend Library’s copies of Francesca Lia Block’s Baby Be-bop. Actual, real-life book-burning wackos do exist in this world, as crazy as that sounds, so we need to be extra-vigilant in keeping censorship at bay.

Posted in 2009, Adult, Prose | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Time of My Life, by Allison Winn Scotch

Time-of-My-Life-Cover-Allison-WinnSpoilers.

Jillian has the seemingly perfect suburban life with a supportive husband and a cute toddler that she gets to stay home with. But underneath the facade, she’s dying. Slowly withering away trying to keep up the perfect-wife-and-mother act. She can’t help but think what her world would be like if she had stayed with her ex-boyfriend, Jack, instead of leaving him behind seven years ago. And then she gets her chance to find out.

This book followed the very predictable path of second-chance books/films, with the main character going back in time and do things over with 20/20 hindsight. Like all second chance plots I’ve seen/read, Jillian of course ends up realizing that she’d rather be with her husband and child than with her ex. She has to work to move back forward in time. There were some surprises with that, but nothing huge.

This was exactly the kind of book I needed right now. Down to earth, homey, feel-good, warm and fuzzy. I was happy with it, though to be completely honest, it probably won’t stick with me on a permanent basis. There was nothing earth shattering or anything. It was just a nice quiet book for me to read.

It did discuss one thing that really struck me on a more personal level, though. One of the things Jillian has a second chance at is getting to know her mother, who abandoned her family when Jillian was nine. There’s a lot of discussion about the sacrifices women tend to make as mothers, and what happens when the pressure becomes too much (because really, isn’t Jillian’s popping back 7 years in the past just as much as an abandonment of her daughter?). Honestly, motherhood and being a stay at home mom is probably the hardest thing I’ve ever done, especially when my three boys were younger. There have been moments when I’ve been tempted to just leave. Thankfully, I’ve always managed to keep a grip on myself and figure out how to alleviate the pressure in order to stay. But it’s been hard. I know it will keep being hard. I know that I can’t not do things for myself. I can’t try to be the perfect mom. That would just kill me. Some people don’t understand, but that’s simply what I have to do to survive and keep my family in tact, which is what’s most important.

Mothers who abandon their families are always looked on as monsters, but I feel sorry for them because I have stood at that teetering point of decision before. I know how hard it is, and I know it’s not because of any lack of love they have for their children. Abandonment is terrible, and leaves behind terrible consequences, but I personally can’t blame the mother too much. I feel her pain. I wish I knew how to make mothers out there know that they don’t have to sublimate themselves for their children. They don’t have to stop living. They do have to be responsible, of course, but being responsible does not mean being perfect or living up to any particular media-fed, societal, or cultural standard. They do not cease to exist just because the children are born, and if they treat themselves as such, they will slowly be bent down into nonexistence. And that’s bad. Bad bad bad.

But enough. That part of the book struck a personal chord with me, while the rest was just cozy. I don’t regret reading it. It was exactly what I was looking for.

Posted in 2009, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Catching Fire, by Suzanne Collins

catching-fireThis will not be a popular review. Most people who have read Catching Fire have said it’s even better than The Hunger Games. I’m afraid I disagree. In fact, I was a little bit disappointed.

Why, you ask? Well, I’ve been turning it over for more than a day now, and I think there are several reasons. First one has to do with the tense. (Yes, I’m a writer. I view things from a writing point of view, not just a storytelling one.) Both books are first person present tense, to give them a sense of immediacy. I’m not a big fan of present tense in literature. It sounds awkward unless it’s done spectacularly, at which point I don’t even notice it. The Hunger Games was spectacular. I’ve read it three times – twice in April, once in July – and all three times, I didn’t realize it was in present tense until more than 200 pages in. There’s one sentence that sounds awkward and kind of jarred me all three times. The fact that I forgot and read normally all three times speaks pretty highly about her use of present tense. Unfortunately, Catching Fire sounded awkward for the first 2/3rds of the book. I kept getting caught up in the sentence phrasing. In the last third, it got better, and this has to do with my second complaint about the book, which is:

Timing. The first book takes place over the course of a few weeks. Everything is either immediate or memory. This works well with the present-tense thing. Catching Fire, on the other hand, takes place over the course of six months, with backtracking for the six months before that. There’s a lot of skipping backwards and forwards in time, a lot of awkward leaps and pauses. It felt more like notes than an actual put-together book. Actually, it felt like Collins wasn’t sure where to begin this book, and was floundering a little bit, which is sad. Once she got to the part where she was on a moment-by-moment pacing again, the book improved dramatically. It stopped being so awkward both in timing and in tense, but unfortunately, then it:

Felt repetitive. Like it was riding off the glory of the first book. It felt like a sequel. It didn’t feel enough like a continuation of the first book, but instead like something she put together because the first one is so popular. I know that’s not the case, but that’s what it felt like to me.

Lastly (when it comes to mechanics), the mini-recaps of the first book felt awkward as well. I know I keep saying that word, but that’s really the best way to describe how this book came off to me. Recaps have to be done well, or maybe I’m just spoiled by a couple authors I know who do them well, but recaps generally irritate me in sequels. I understand why they’re there, but these weren’t done well enough for my liking.

Beyond mechanics, I was really annoyed by a couple of characterization things. First, there was too much focus on the love-triangle-that-isn’t-really-a-love-triangle. That plotline got old, fast. Second, Katniss’s character went from a girl who is so paranoid that she’s a little blind to people’s motivations, which was excellent, to a girl who can’t make a correct judgement if (when) her life depended on it. She goes from blind and a bit naive to downright stupid. I don’t like her being stupid. She didn’t feel like herself. I think this little bit offended me more than everything else, because I really connected with Katniss in the first book. We have similar personalities – I’m the sort of person that can become so focused that I don’t see everything around me. But she isn’t blind in this book, she’s dumb. And needlessly dumb. That saddened me.

Now, I’ve laid out all the things I didn’t like, but I don’t want to make it sound like I didn’t like this book at all. I don’t think it was anywhere near as good as The Hunger Games, but it was still good. I was still captivated and didn’t want to put the book down, especially in that last third when the pacing improved. I really liked that it explored the idea of what happens to victor tributes after they go home, how their lives change (think about the way people’s lives change after winning the lottery, only that lottery was pretty brutal). The characterization of everyone except Katniss was well done. I liked the build up to the next installment. At the end of The Hunger Games, I actually liked the idea of it being a standalone work with an ambiguous end. I would have preferred no sequel. Of course I’m in the extreme minority here – I only know one other person who feels this way – but that’s how I felt. The book didn’t feel like it led toward a sequel, and hence Catching Fire feels like merely a bridge between two books in a series. It feels trapped out of time a bit, rushing forward, getting in all the plot points without spending too much time on them, that sort of thing. I wish some parts were expanded, others ignored, and most of all, that the timing was different.

This book could have been great, but it wasn’t. Not for me. It fell flat. I do plan to read it again and get a better feel for it, but I don’t think it will make my top ten list of the year.

So I ask, very politely, to please excuse my minority opinion here. Many, many other people love this book and think it’s even better than the first, so you shouldn’t trust my judgement. It’s a book you should try out on your own.

*******

Revisited summer 2010: [Spoilers] This is my fourth read of The Hunger Games. I read it first for readathon in April ’09, right in the middle of the night, so I read it a second time that week to make sure I remembered all the details properly. I then reread it closer to the Catching Fire release in 2009.

Fourth time through, I love this book just as much as I loved it the first three. The same sections made me cry, especially when District 11 sends the bread to Katniss and she thanks them aloud. That’s when my grief for Rue swells up and spills out. I love that the book is in present tense but doesn’t feel awkward. I love that even in all the violence and pain, nothing feels gratuitous or written for shock.

Most of all, I love Katniss. She is so strong, so brave, so determined, and yet at the same time, because she’s been forced to focus her vision into the tunnel of survival, she’s so blind. It’s the perfect character flaw. Her blindness makes her endearing, and makes me want to root for her. I love that in everything she does, she never realizes that those around her aren’t just like her. That not everyone is playing a game or planning a strategy. She expects them to behave the same way she does, because to her, that’s what survival is all about. Those who have a strategy and a plan, she understands. Those who are selfless, like Peeta, she misjudges. It’s the perfect balance.

I can’t sing this book’s praises enough. Even after four times, it’s just as wonderful.

Mockingjay

I have no expectations for Mockingjay, really, though I have this small hope that I’ll find out Cinna is still alive, even if he’s had his tongue cut out. This series isn’t like with Harry Potter, where I spent hours trying to figure out what was going to happen in the next book. I’ve never tried to look forward. Instead, I’m just looking forward to the ride! The only thing that I hope will be resolved is the love triangle.

Peeta vs Gale

This, of course, is the big war going on all over the blogosphere. Which boy will Katniss end up with, Peeta or Gale? People who love Peeta are adamantly anti-Gale, and vice versa, so I thought I’d give my thoughts on the two boys.

[fyi I wrote this whole part of the post prior to rereading Catching Fire. My feelings against Gale have intensified since then, but are essentially the same.]

Peeta: He’s kind, thoughtful, protective, and desperately in love with Katniss. Some people see him as manipulative, but I disagree with that. I tried to read that into his character during my fourth read of the first book, and I just can’t. Everything he does is not for his own survival, but for hers.

Having said that, I don’t think he deserves Katniss. Don’t get me wrong – I love Katniss, but she has never been able to separate out in her head the strategy she thought Peeta was using and the truth about his feelings. Their love-act is completely wrapped up in the games, something she would rather forget. They would have been good together under other circumstances. His kindness and gentleness would be a perfect compliment to her toughness and intensity. But not when they were thrown in together that way.

Gale: He’s a lot like Katniss – angry, stubborn, foolhardy, focused, and the consummate survivor. The two have known each other for years and have become so close as hunting partners that they can almost read each other’s minds. Gale is also jealous, possessive, controlling, and judgmental. I get the impression that if Katniss chooses someone other than him, he’ll refuse to ever have anything to do with her again, and to me, that is not love. I don’t believe Gale loves her at all. He wants her, but he doesn’t love her.

Gale is far more like a sibling than he is like a boyfriend, and if he and Katniss were to get together, their relationship would be a disaster. They are both too stubborn and alike. No one would give, and the relationship – and therefore the friendship – would rip into shreds. Furthermore, anyone who acts that jealous and possessive towards another person is someone I regard as dangerous. I could easily see Gale turning into a wife-beater in the future. He and Katniss would be better off remaining friends, assuming he would even deign to be her friend if she chooses someone else.

Comparison: The difference between the two guys to me is this: Gale would protect Katniss only if he knows she will stay with him, whereas Peeta would protect her no matter what. Gale thinks about himself more than he thinks about Katniss. Peeta always thinks of Katniss first. His love for her is unconditional, which is the only kind of love that’s worth having.

But even saying that, I don’t think Katniss should end up with Peeta. If she has to end up with one of them, I’d much prefer Peeta over Gale. But Katniss has been very clear through both books on this subject: she doesn’t want to get into a relationship. She definitely doesn’t want to get married and have kids! I hope so much that Katniss sticks with this decision in Mockingjay. The wavering in Catching Fire drove me crazy because Katniss has made it clear she’s not in love with either guy. She regards Gale as her brother, and his romantic feelings toward her confuse her. Her relationship with Peeta is all mixed up with the games and is very confusing as well. What Katniss needs is to grow up and be alone, unless and until she meets someone who makes her change her mind about marriage. Neither Gale nor Peeta can do that.

I am 100% Team Katniss!

Posted in 2009, 2010, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel

200px-Like_Water_for_Chocolate_(Book_Cover)[joint review and recipe by my husband and me]

Recipe: Gignac Tiramisu

Ingredients: 24 Milano cookies, 5 egg yolks, 1/3 C sugar, 1/2 C heavy cream, 2 tsp REAL vanilla (no extract!), 14 oz cream cheese, 3/4 C espresso

Jason: So… this isn’t exactly a book you can synopsize… I suppose the closest I can come is that this is a book of magical realism following a woman who is the inheritor of her family’s legacy of cooking, as she falls in love with a man she’s not allowed to be with. And, the book is told in the form of a cookbook, the story being woven into a series of 12 recipes. Did I miss anything? Do you want to talk about Magical Realism? This was my first Magical Realism novel…

In a heatproof bowl, beat eggs and 1/3 C sugar on high, until thick and pale yellow. Put the bowl in a skillet of barely simmering water to make a bain-marie, and whisk until the mixture begins to thicken. Remove and let cool for 15 minutes, stirring occasionally. It’s important that the bain-marie not be too hot, because the eggs will curdle, much like Jason’s face when he reviewed ‘Lair of the White Worm’ – but luckily not today, today his face above the steam of the bain is shining and glossy just as the yolks.

Amanda: I think this might be my first Magical Realism book, too. At least for modern times. I mean, there were a lot of elements I recognized from old-old literature: stories from the Arabian Nights, ancient Greek stories, even some of the older stories from the Bible (like Lot’s wife turning into a pillar of salt). I’m not sure I even knew what magical realism was until I read this book. It was really hard for me to classify it altogether. Historical fiction, cookbook, a bit of romance, a bit of the fantastical… thrown together, that made it all very unique. At least for my experience.

Mexican vanilla is the best kind, with a lower alcohol content and a much purer taste. It also comes in a wine-sized bottle with a convenient long neck that Amanda grasps onto as she takes several quick, greedy sniffs after the bottle is opened. This leaves her brain-drunk and giddy for several hours, proving the good quality of the vanilla.

Jason: I wasn’t sure how to think of the magic when you described it to me, before I read it. In the experience, though, it was part of the real power of the book, sort of this metaphor for the bubbling, powerful energy that lives in the woman, her family, in love, in the world, in food, etc. The entire conflict between the bubbling, earthy magic, that comes from the old ‘pagan world’ (the cook, the protagonist, the Navajo mother) and the cold necromantic magic of religion (her mother and her mother’s ghost, her older sister) felt like one of the real themes of the book. But then, I know you weren’t sure if you thought the book was supposed to be symbolic – what do you think, now, after a few days of reflecting?

The cream and the vanilla – together, and alone, they are like a very thick glass of milk. It is the whisk that changes them; you whip and they thicken – but it’s not like a sauce. A sauce thickens when you make it heavier – flour or corn starch or roux. The cream is akin to the clouds, and when it is reintroduced to its old friend air, the two intertwine themselves into a powerful, pale nimbus.

Amanda: It’s not that I didn’t think the book was symbolic so much as it had symbolism woven in, rather than being a single metaphor. It wasn’t like a fable, where everything stood for something else, but it definitely made careful use of symbolism. I can’t honestly say what the overall symbolism stood for, though. In some ways, the book’s message was really confusing to me because I’m so unused to the genre. In others, I think it’s fairly straightforward: love is the essence of life; a strong, powerful, burning force that can’t be controlled or put out. Not without a lot of work, at least. Any symbolism beyond that, someone would have to teach me and point it out. I’d love to learn some of the deeper layers of this. Right now I’m too ignorant to see them alone.

The cream cheese must next be beaten until whipped and fluffy. Fold this and the yolk mix into the vanilla-perfumed whipped cream. This must be done as lightly as possible, to keep the custard airy, else the Tiramisu will be flat and heavy with disappointment.

Jason: See, one thing that I thought was interesting, there was a sort of cosmic conflict going on it: good versus evil, chaotic energy versus ordered apathy, domesticity versus high-flown religion. In fact, it’s interesting to me, that there was a sort of Christ/Buddha/Orpheus symbolism surrounding the antagonist the whole time (think of, for instance, her being pierced by thorns, and then her sister eating the food that had her blood in it, and being redeemed by it, in a way…). But what was really GREAT about it was that it WAS a very normal story – girl wants boy, girl can’t have boy, girl fights for and pines for boy. If she was a real person, she would seem ordinary, even boring – she’s just a girl who lives with her mom and likes to cook, you know? But, the magic in the story reveals the real power of the everyday and the domestic, versus the phantasmic and eventually illusory power of the opposing force. There is more power in rolling out tortillas then in a mass, that was the message, I guess, that I got. How did the book make you feel?

Lay the first layer of milanos, drizzle them with espresso, and spread half of the creamy filling across the top, tucking them in like a blanket. The milanos, before you spread them are like headstones or bassinets, and when filled with bubbling energy of the coffee bean, they leap and grasp towards the lips – the cream must lay down beside it and wrap it in its arms, to soothe it back to sleep, to lay it down again in its grave and rock it gently into the sleep. Now, do all that again, with the other milanos, the other water-of-life, the other blanketing custard.

Amanda: Interesting ideas – I love the idea that the domestic woman taking care of her whole family is shown off as the one with real power – the real head of the household, despite being held down by the people around her. So often, the domestic person is the one that is ignored, even by the writer, unless they break out of their domestic role. In this book, however, Tita’s role in the kitchen is what influences everything. That isn’t an ordinary statement. Very refreshing. And very endearing.

I loved Like Water for Chocolate. It was not at all what I expected going into it, and it’s going to stick with me for a long time. I really want to read more by Esquivel in the future. You?

The last layer of custard lies across the top of the pan like an unsullied, creamy blanket. With a sifter, sprinkle a generous amount of unsweetened cocoa evenly across it, creating a unique Rorschach test that bleeds into the custard below.

Jason: Oh yes! I’d love to read the new book about Malinche, particularly, and I’d really like to try some of the other giants of this genre: Isabel Allende, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, etc. That’s interesting about the power being in being the ‘housewife’ not in breaking out of that role. It was wonderful to read someone who loved taking care of people, rather than who was being slowly destroyed by it (you, know like The Awakening. Which I loved, don’t get me wrong). It was beautiful to read a book that glorified an ‘art form’ that we usually ignore, like cooking, it reminds me of the art displays they do now of old quilts, or incidental needlework. Overall, this was a very warm, comforting book, one that glorified in small things, and made you feel life has meaning for everyone, not just the famous and the obvious heroes. Any parting thoughts?

The Milanos are wed to the custard, and laid down in their beds. Their marriage is blessed by the pixie dust of cocoa across the top. And now, cover it loosely with saran wrap, like a sly rose laid across the nuptial pillow; set it away in the fridge; and leave it be. An hour is fine, but a day is better – food, like love, takes time to be at its best, and with time, the cream is filled with the invigorating seed of the cookies, the cookies filled with the subtle transcendent intoxication of the cream.

Amanda: Nothing much, just that I’m so glad to have read this book. Plus, I didn’t realize Marquez did magic realism and I’m now looking forward to his books even more!

About the recipe:

Amanda: The first time we made Tiramisu was back when we were a young couple in college. We didn’t know where to find ladyfingers (plus, our rundown grocery store in 3rd ward Houston probably wouldn’t have had them anyway), so we substituted Milano cookies, which worked infinitely better in our opinion. We’ve used them ever since. We also didn’t drink coffee, nor did we know how to make espresso, so our “espresso” involved hot water and some spoonfuls of instant coffee granules. We also kept out the normal alcohol content for simplicity’s sake. Our version is not at all like the Italian recipe it comes from, but it actually tastes far better and is always a hit when we serve it.

Jason: We’ve made this recipe a number of times over the years, though, in classic Jason style, the recipe is a little fuzzy (nothing I cook is ever the same twice, unfortunately). But, we hope you enjoy eating it, as much as we enjoyed reading this book. It’s at least a LITTLE easier than some of the recipes in this book – holy cow, Laura Esquivel!

(Thanks for putting up with our poor attempt at replicating the tone of the book in this review!)

Posted in 2009, Adult, Prose | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Dead Days of Summer, by Carolyn Hart

deadDead Days of Summer is actually the 17th book in the Death on Demand series. Annie Darling runs a mystery book shop called Death on Demand, and apparently gets involved in mysteries time and time again. In this particular book, her husband Max is framed for the murder of a beautiful young woman, Vanessa. Annie and her friends must find the real killer before Max is convicted and put away for the rest of his life.

I’m not really a mystery kind of girl, so I couldn’t tell you if this book is good or not per all the rules of a mystery novel. I can only give you my outsider’s point of view. I liked this okay. There were some formulaic writing things that really irritated me (like describing Vanessa as having a “cat-in-the-cream smile” which is just cringingly bad), but I certainly got drawn into the plot. I never really guessed the killer, because I expected it to be someone other than the three obvious suspects – they were too obvious, I thought. However, the fact that Hart let the killer be one of the obvious suspects was sort of nice. Realistic. In real life, the killer would be one of the obvious suspects. And it was certainly unexpected for me for the killer to NOT be some obscure character half-mentioned earlier in the plot.

Everything also wrapped up nicely, except I’m still confused on one point. Don’t worry; no spoilers. I just don’t understand why Max was ever involved at all. I mean, I know the killer needed someone to frame, but how in the world did he convince Vanessa to do what she did to Max to get him in the right place? It makes no sense. There’s no way she could believe she was going to get what she wanted from the killer by plotting to bring some random, unrelated guy to a bar and drug him. It has nothing to do with anything. There was never any connection to Max at all. I’m still trying to figure that out. Either Vanessa was really idiotic, or I missed a serious plot point somewhere. I wouldn’t discount that second suggestion, though – I don’t know what I’m supposed to be looking for when reading a mystery.

So this was fun. I’m definitely not going to take up reading mysteries in general, but I enjoyed my light break. Next time I think I’ll read a less genre-like mystery. Maybe the Ladies No. 1 Detective Agency. I have that on my shelf and it’s supposed to transcend its genre. I’ve heard it’s excellent.

Posted in 2009, Adult, Prose | Tagged | Leave a comment

Jane Eyre (graphic novel), by Charlotte Bronte

janeeyre (1)This is exactly what the title says – a graphic novel version of Jane Eyre. It’s part of a series of graphic novels aimed at helping teens enjoy classics through a different media. There are several versions of the GN – a quick text and one that uses the original text. I read the latter.

Part of me thinks this is a really good idea. If these graphic novels will help introduce kids to classics and get them interested in reading literature, great. On the other hand, if they take the place of literature, I don’t think that’s so good. Hopefully these will encourage readers to read the full text and not just settle for this shortened, illustrated version. Nothing wrong with graphic novels adaptations, but they certainly can’t live up to the original in my opinion. (Not usually, at least. I do admit to liking the graphic novel version of Kafka’s The Trial better than the original…)

I love Jane Eyre. It’s one of my favorite books. Unfortunately, while this version stuck to the plot, it just couldn’t convey everything that was in the original novel. I didn’t expect it to, of course. Just like I don’t expect a movie to convey the entire thing. This did as well as could be expected, but at the end, mostly I just wanted to delve into the real book again. 🙂 It was a great reading experience, though. And fun to know that pretty much no matter what form I read or see Jane Eyre in, I will enjoy it and get completely engrossed by the end.

What I really need to read now is my copy of Jane Eyre illustrated by Dame Darcy. I got it for Christmas last year and have yet to read it. It’s so pretty…I really need to get to it soon!

Posted in 2009, Adult, Visual | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Hold Still, by Nina LaCour

holdThis book is about suicide. Caitlin’s best friend, Ingrid, kills herself, and suddenly Caitlin doesn’t know how to live anymore. She’s frozen in time. The past is too painful to look back at, the future is too uncertain.

I don’t want to say much more about the plot, but there is a diary involved. That sounds a little cliched when I put it like that, but it doesn’t feel that way in the book. For one, I don’t believe the diary helps Caitlin heal any. It actually seems to make her feel worse for a long time. It keeps opening the wound. Also, Caitlin can’t really bear to read much of what’s in there, so she skips over a lot of it. The healing process unfolds after a long time and very naturally – completely unrelated to this journal. I appreciated that.

I’ve read a lot of books lately that have dealt with suicide or death of a loved one. In Saving Zoe, Echo reads through her sister’s diary to cope with her death. In Thirteen Reasons Why, Hannah leaves an audio suicide message to each person she blames for her suicide. I kind of thought, having read so much of this sort of book in the last few months, that I might be burnt out on the subject. I thought Hold Still would feel redundant. It didn’t. There was a certain maturity in this book that I’m not used to. It said things such as:

  • Good people can be total jerks given the right situation. Even when they know they’re being total jerks, they might just continue doing so because doing otherwise makes them too uncomfortable.
  • Parents often come up with bizarre methods for trying to help you cope. Sometimes, though, they surprise you by understanding things in a way you just can’t see from your vantage point.
  • Saying “I have to go away because otherwise I’ll hurt you” is just an excuse, just a way for someone to forgive themselves for going away. The motive is far more selfish than unselfish.
  • When someone kills themselves, loved ones are left feeling far guiltier than they actually are.
  • Everything we do affects the people around us, so we need to be careful. At the same time, however, each person will interpret our actions according to their own point of view, so it’s impossible to know how our each act affects others. We have to be careful, but we also can’t take full responsibility for someone else misunderstanding us.

This was a good book. I hope it doesn’t get lost among the myriads of books out there dealing with suicide and loss. It deserves to be read.

Posted in 2009, Prose, Young Adult | 1 Comment

Protected: Kampung Boy, by Lat

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

Posted in 2009, Adult, Visual | Tagged , | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: Naomi and Ely’s No Kiss List, by Rachel Cohn and David Levithan

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

Posted in 2009, Prose, Young Adult | Tagged , , | Enter your password to view comments.