Books:
Archive:
Favorite Reviews:
I have reviewed many books over the years, and some reviews have been more interesting or fun to write than others. The below list were my favorites to write.
• Ada, or Ardor
• Choose Your Own Autobiography
• Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
• If Not, Winter
• Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell
• The Kid Table
• Like Water for Chocolate
• Lolita
• The Monk
• The Night Circus
• Oathbringer
• Return of the Native
• Rhythm of War
• S
• Things Fall Apart
• The Unit
• The Woods Are Always WatchingCategories:
Tags:
- abandoned
- Africa
- Asia
- atmospheric
- audio
- BBAW
- body image
- callback
- circus horror
- classics
- collection
- comfort
- Cosmere
- cruise
- divinity
- dream-invader
- education
- end of year
- fanfiction
- favorite
- fitness
- food
- gender studies
- goals
- good omens
- Harry Potter
- health
- historical
- house
- humor
- I made a thing.
- joint review
- KonMari
- Latin America
- LGBTQIA
- lists
- memorable
- Middle East
- mini-review
- multi-read
- nonfiction
- photography
- place-character
- POC
- portentous
- psychology
- quarantine
- race report
- readathon
- reread
- revisiting
- RIP-worthy
- running
- shredded me
- speculative
- Sunday Coffee
- tarot
- tattoo
- the ferals
- translation
- travel
- Wellness Wednesday
- WTF moments
- Yarn Art


-


Protected: The Magicians, by Lev Grossman
Posted in 2012, Adult, Prose
Tagged Harry Potter, revisiting, speculative
Enter your password to view comments.
The Chaperone, by Laura Moriarty
Everyone and their mother is reading this book right now, so I hopped on the bandwagon this weekend and zoomed right through it. Going into the book, I thought the story was about Louise Brooks – famous silent film actress, featured on the book’s cover – and the summer she first went to NYC. But it’s not, really. Louise Brooks does go to NYC, but this book is all about Cora, her chaperone there (hence the title). Cora has her own reasons to go to NYC, connected with her distant past.
I’m afraid I wasn’t as impressed with this book as everyone else seems to be. There were definitely good things about it. It was very readable, and I was hooked by Cora’s story instantly. I liked how the part about her past panned out, not perfect and not unrealistic. I liked her development as a person as well.
Unfortunately, the bad outweighed the good for me. There were a lot of little things that bugged me, so I’m just going to list them out.
–I’m not sure Louise Brooks was really needed to make this book work. She felt more like a vehicle, and a far-fetched one at times, particularly in the last third of the book. Cora’s relationship with her never felt all that real, and Cora’s story would have worked just as well if she’d chaperoned some fictional girl no one’s ever heard of to NYC.
–I personally have a bit of trouble believing fictional accounts of how real people acted (not just in this book, but any book based on real people). While I know many of the things said about Louise in this book are true, the very negative way she was portrayed feels unfair, since she’s not around to defend herself. That could be my ignorance, since I don’t know nearly as much about her as the author, I’m sure, but this is always how I feel when I read books that seriously portray real-life people.
–Most of the book was told in third-person limited POV, sticking with Cora, but periodically, it would shift into an omniscient narrator, talking about how years later Cora would do things or feel things differently because of what was going on in the story now. That was jarring every time.
–The majority of the book takes place in the 1920s, which was a very transitional time in American history. While historical background in a book must be realistic about these things, and have them as part of the atmosphere, I think The Chaperone tried to make too many of them part of the foreground of the book. It almost felt like a checklist, with a section for everything: prohibition, war, racial integration, religious conflict, women’s lib, homosexuality, and so on.
–Lastly, I felt the book stretched out way too long. Not the book length itself, but the timeline. Most of the story is about one summer in 1922, but then the last few chapters rush through sixty years of time. None of this felt necessary or relevant to me, and seemed mostly a tool to see what Louise Brooks was up to in that time. Since Louise never felt like a major part of the book to me, as I said above, I wished the book had just cut off before the rush of time.
Now, I doubt most of those things would bother other readers. The book has gotten great reviews and a lot of people really love it. I wish I had loved it too, but unfortunately, I didn’t. Having said that, though, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend the book to others. I do think it’s a book that many people can connect with, and even for me, though I didn’t end up loving it at the end, it was easy to read and hooked my attention from the beginning. I don’t mean to make it sound all bad. It certainly wasn’t, and I did really like the first half of the book. The negatives just ended up outweighing the positives for me by the end.
Warbreaker, by Brandon Sanderson
This is one of those books that has so many intertwining plotlines that I couldn’t possibly begin to write a summary. There’s a God that doesn’t believe in his own divinity, a princess forced to marry for the sake of her country, a sentient sword, a system of magic built on color, and a political climate aiming for war. A whole lot is wrapped up in here, and I’ve been discussing the book in detail for the last five weeks with my group read.
In general, I liked Warbreaker, but it wasn’t nearly as good as other books by Sanderson that I’ve read. The thing I really like about Sanderson is the way he handles character. Warbreaker didn’t seem so focused on character, and in places it felt like character was sacrificed for plot twists. There were a lot of unanswered questions by the end, despite it being a standalone book, and I just wasn’t satisfied. However, Sanderson at his worst is still better than many books I’ve read, and I did enjoy reading the book. I just…wouldn’t recommend starting with this one, if you’re looking to give him a try.
Three things to note (9/24/14): 1 – My original weekly group discussions have been unfortunately lost. 2 – Despite what I said here, this was actually the easiest/fastest book to get into of all the Sanderson books I’ve read, so it actually would make a good introduction to him in that way. 3 – Despite this not being my favorite during the initial reading, this is one that has stayed very powerful in my memory and has grown into a favorite in the time since. I do plan to revisit and re-review in the future.
Note: This book was reread and rereviewed in Jan/Feb 2016.
Posted in 2012, Adult, Prose
Tagged Cosmere, divinity, humor, memorable, speculative, WTF moments
2 Comments
What I Talk About When I Talk About Running, by Haruki Murakami (audio)
I’ve never read anything by Murakami before. He’s one of those authors that scares me, probably because a long time ago I heard a rumor about some sort of animal brutality in his book Kafka on the Shore. I’m not the sort of person who likes to read vivid descriptions of any sort of brutality, so I have avoided his books. But Jenners talked about this short memoir, and it sounded like something I would enjoy. Running and writing novels, paired and compared.
I started writing very young, in my childhood, and got serious about it in my 20s. I’ve written many, many novels now, two of which are in good, query-ready condition. Up until 2006, I had never considered writing a novel, and had focused on short stories for most of my life. But in 2006, I decided to try, and I’ve gone through the painstaking, rigorous novel-writing procedure many times now. I love it, and I can definitely understand when Murakami likens novel-writing to long-distance running.
I am not much of a runner, and never have been, but I have been trying to get better at it since August of 2010. In the last few months, I finally got to where I can run a full 5K, even though I’m ridiculously slow at it (around a 14-15 minute mile pace). I enjoy running. I’m looking forward to the day when I can run faster, and longer, than I can now. And again, I can see why Murakami compares running and novel-writing. They really do have some strong similarities.
This was an enjoyable book, particularly in the first half. Murakami got me more excited about running, and made me think about setting up schedules that focus not on distance or speed, but just time spent running. But from the beginning, he also warns that this book is not a how-to on running, or even an attempt to persuade others to run. He’s just talking about how running has influenced his life, and the way he approaches the sport. These warnings are good, because the second half of the book sort of curbed my running enthusiasm, as he went on to talk about grueling training sessions and ultra-marathon races. I don’t see myself ever wanting to run a marathon, much less a 62-mile (or longer) ultra-marathon, and Murakami’s training schedules seemed a bit…extreme. I think for myself, I would prefer a more moderate approach!
Still, it was a good book to read, and I’m glad to say I finally read a book by an author who really does terrify me.
Performance: This audiobook was read by Ray Porter, who is a new-to-me narrator. He did a fine job. Nothing spectacular, but I have nothing negative to say either.
Posted in 2012, Adult, Prose
Tagged Asia, audio, fitness, nonfiction, POC, running, translation
Leave a comment
Pavilion of Women, by Pearl S. Buck
As Madame Wu reaches her fortieth birthday, she makes a decision that will change the life of everyone in her multi-generational housing complex. She decides that she will retire from being a woman, and bring a concubine to live with her (up-until-then faithful) husband in her place.
This is the third book I’ve read by Buck. The Good Earth, my first read, was a brilliant book, one of my favorites ever. My second read, Death in the Castle, was completely different in language, tone, and style, and far more mediocre. Pavilion of Women was far closer in style to The Good Earth, and I enjoyed it nearly as much (at least for the first 2/3rds – I’ll get to that later). I really liked Madame Wu right away. She lives in this rich family, controlling her husband without ever seeming, to his eyes, to control him. She manages everything in the house, from the accounts to her sons’ brides. Now, after 24 years of this management and submitting herself to her husband’s ardor night after night, all she wants to do is sit back in a quiet room and read.
Pavilion of Women was published in 1948, and I wonder if there was any uproar against it when it came out. The narrator is deceptively outspoken, cloaked in a quiet, self-deprecating manor, even in her silent narration. Lines like this one jumped out at me, not-so-subtle but also not at all what I would expect from proper, stately Madame Wu:
…she saw his dark eyes flicker and burn with a flame certainly more intense than she had seen for a long time. She closed her eyes, and her heart began to beat. Would she regret her decision? She lay as soft as a plucked flower for the next two hours, asking herself many times this question. Would she regret? Would she not regret?
At the end of the two hours, she knew she would not regret.
It’s written so poetically, but the poetry doesn’t hide it’s meaning. This woman is tired of sleeping with her husband for two hours every night! The book is full of these little innuendos, both sexual and political, which made the book far more rebellious than I was expecting.
One of my favorite aspects of the book is how deep Buck goes into Chinese culture, religion, and lifestyle. She lived in China for years, from her early childhood, and I think she got as close as anyone can get to really knowing a culture, while still being slightly outside of it. Unlike many writers of the time, when she writes about this non-Western culture, she does so with respect. So many writers spoke of non-Western cultures as being either inferior, exotic, or savage. Buck’s love of China and Chinese culture really comes through in Pavilion of Women, just as it did in The Good Earth. She writes about customs and beliefs without bias – without praise or censure. I feel like I can trust her portrayal.
I loved this book from the beginning, but unfortunately, the last third of the book shifted downwards for me. The book changed focus from Madame Wu and her household, to her spiritual awakening through a non-denominational priest named Brother André. While I liked Brother André’s character a lot, especially the way he never preached religion but lived what he believed a good life should be, I didn’t like that the book became moralistic and preachy through his influence. It was especially incongruous because André himself was not preachy or moralistic! So that, coupled with a few “amazing coincidences” and “happy endings,” made the end of the book feel forced and unrealistic. I preferred the neutral series of events in The Good Earth – some good, some bad – to the way Pavilion of Women ended. Other than that, though, I enjoyed the book, and it was nice to read something similar in style and tone to The Good Earth, which as I said before, is one of my very favorites.
Posted in 2012, Adult, Prose
Tagged Asia, classics, divinity, gender studies, historical, POC
Leave a comment
Thumped, by Megan McCafferty
Last year, when I read Bumped, I really, really enjoyed it. A commercially-based dystopia – something completely unique! I was really looking forward to Thumped, but the book didn’t work quite as well for me as Bumped did. There wasn’t a whole lot wrong with it – the writing was less tight, and it got a bit preachy/moralizing in bits – but it just didn’t have the same flare as Bumped for me. Bumped made me laugh, it surprised me in many places, and there was far more character development. Thumped was far more about plot, and the seemingly-required plan to overthrow the dystopia world that exists in today’s YA dystopia. That made it much less interesting to me. Still glad I read it, and it was a lot of fun, one of those books you read in a single session because you don’t want to put it down. I just wish there had been a little bit more to it.
Faithful Place, by Tana French (audio)
I’m not a real mystery reader, but right around this time of year, I always get in the mood for a good mystery story for some reason. Been that way for the last few years, and this year is no exception. When I started feeling the urge this year, I picked up the audio of Faithful Place from the library.
Faithful Place is the third of the Dublin Murder Squad series by Tana French. Each book is narrated by a new person, introduced in the previous book. This book is narrated by Frank Mackey, a squad leader in the undercover department. Mackey left home 22 years ago and never looked back, but is drawn back to family when a decades-old murder of his long-ago girlfriend comes to light. While there is a murder in this book – two of them, actually – the primary focus of this novel is on family. Mackey is from a home and an area where the worst crimes possible aren’t murder, rape, or assault, but calling the cops and blood disloyalty. He has to disentangle justice as his family taught him and justice as written by law.
The murderer is easily spotted almost from the very beginning of this book. There are no real twists and turns as far as the mystery goes. However, I found Faithful Place far more intriguing than the first two books in the series, because of its emphasis on family and the contrast of two ideas about right and wrong. It isn’t really about who committed the crimes, but about how Mackey deals with the aftermath. French does a fabulous job portraying the culture he comes from, and working through his conflict between family and law. I really enjoyed the way his character developed all the way through the end of the book, which is not something I could say for either of the first two narrators in this series.
The ending was fractured, partially hopeful, partially painful, and incredibly realistic. Definitely my favorite of French’s books so far. I had issues with the narrator’s actions in the first book, and some believability issues with the second book, but no issues with this one. It was exactly right, and I’m looking forward to the next installment of the series.
Performance: The audio was read by Tim Gerard Reynolds. This is my first experience with him, and I thought he did a fabulous job. Perfectly in character, and his reading lent itself to the gritty atmosphere of the book.
Book 1: In the Woods
Book 2: The Likeness
The Way of Kings, by Brandon Sanderson
I am not even going to attempt to summarize the plot to this book. It is far too epic, too gargantuan, to summarize. Sorry ’bout that.
So…more high fantasy from Brandon Sanderson. What can I say? I like the guy. I like the way he writes. And I’ve been on a real fantasy kick for all of 2012 so far. It’s what’s appealing to me right now. Nothing else, really, has been crying out to me. So even though this is a bit weird for me, I’m just going to roll with it as long as the mood lasts.
The Way of Kings is a very good book. I do have to say, though, that I’m really glad I didn’t start with this one when I decided to give Sanderson a chance. If I had, I would have given up pretty quickly and written the guy off as not for me. I never would have read the Mistborn trilogy, which has become one of my favorite reads of the year, and I definitely wouldn’t have made it far enough into this book to enjoy it. See, Mistborn wasn’t that high when it comes to fantasy. It was far more mild: a world that in many ways seemed related to our own, a magic system with its own rules, and a class conflict. I can deal with that. Really, that’s not all that different from, say, Harry Potter. But The Way of Kings? Completely out of my comfort zone. Everything about this world is different – races/species, animals, plants, history, cultures, languages, names, terminology, religion…everything. And for about the first 400 pages, it was a struggle to adjust.
This book is just over 1000 pages long, and it’s not a standalone. I believe, actually, that this is the first book in what is supposed to be a massive, multi-book long epic. [Wikipedia tells me it will be ten volumes long.] It introduces a new world, multiple plots, tons of characters, and the threads of many plots-to-be. The story switches from one character to another in only tangentially-related plots, until I was completely dizzy. Between trying to keep track of who was who, and what was what, and when was when, and simply figuring out how this world worked, it took me a long time to really get into the book. “Long” meaning, as I said above, 400 pages. I kept going because Sanderson has proven to me in the past that he can pull off a fantastic book. If it had been by anyone else, I would have given up. Those first 400 pages were HARD. But I persevered, and I’m happy that I did. In the end, it was worth it.
There are many things that Sanderson is good at, but in my opinion, where he really excels is in character. He knows how to create people that you will care about, even if you don’t like them in the beginning. Beyond that, he really understands friendship and interpersonal relationships. In Mistborn, I came to love Kelsier’s thieving crew, and in this book, I came to love Kaladin’s awkward, mismatched, surly bridge crew. By the time they have their last night of stew, I wanted to hug the book. Sanderson makes friendships that feel like family, and I love that. (Note: there were many more characters that I loved, not just the bridge crew, but if I go on about this point, this post might become as long as the book itself and I would rather it not. I will say, though, that my favorite character so far is Shallan! I want to see so much more from her!)
I am really looking forward to the next installment of this series. There are sooooo many unanswered questions here! I didn’t mind that, because I can tell that many of them are left that way intentionally, to be addressed in further volumes. This is only the beginning of what promises to be a fantastic ride, and I’m glad I’ll be along for it.
Note: This book was reread and re-reviewed in Jan 2016.
Fire and Hemlock, by Diana Wynne Jones
At 19 years old, Polly suddenly realizes that she has two sets of memories. She explores back through the newly-uncovered memories from her tenth through fifteenth years, where she gatecrashed a bizarre funeral, made friends with a meek cellist, and created secret hero-lives for them both that nearly got them killed. Only after she’s explored all these memories does she realize that she will soon need to be a hero in real life, to save someone she didn’t even remember that she loved.
I was impressed with this book from the very first page. I’ve read a lot of Diana Wynne Jones since Howl’s Moving Castle back in January, and this is the first one I’ve read where the writing felt mature. Some of the books I’ve read, while very fun to read, have been a bit sloppy in technique. Because Jones is such a great storyteller, I didn’t mind that so much, but it was an interesting experience to suddenly come across polished, careful writing from her.
The plot drew me in immediately. I liked Polly and Tom, and the way their friendship grew despite the large age difference. I was intrigued by Laurel, the funeral, and the NOWHERE vases. There was a lot I didn’t understand, but the threads kept coming together into something that promised to be fantastic.
Then I got to the end, and it all sort of…fell apart. It’s not like the ending was bad, it just felt incomplete. As if I stopped reading several chapters before the story finished. The last few pages were so rushed and left tons of unanswered questions. I don’t mind ambiguity in a book, but this felt more than ambiguous. It felt unraveled. I don’t know. Maybe if I reread it, I’d understand it better? Maybe some of the threads would be easier to see on second read? I’m not willing to say I disliked the book, because I didn’t. I enjoyed it immensely, and never wanted to put it down. But in the end, I just wanted more. It left me unsatisfied.